The tests of truth (or criteria of truth) denote rules and standards applied to gauge the correctness of claims and statements. These criteria are implements of verification, whose necessity is compelled by the differing statements of various philosophies.
The first test is the Coherence Test. The coherence theory of truth states that a statement or belief is correct on the condition that it jells with other philosophies which jointly create an all-inclusive description of reality (Mitchell, 2018). An example of coherence test is the Pythagorean theorem, where the claim that squaring the hypotenuse of the right triangle will be equivalent to the adding the squares of the other two sides is considered to be factual since it suits correctly with other geometric claims.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The second test is the correspondence test, which claims that a proposition should match up with an event or object for it to be factual (Mitchell, 2018). For instance, the assertion that the White House is located in Washington, D.C. is factual, in case the White House is indeed situated in Washington.
The third test is the pragmatic test, which asserts that a concept is true if it works. Therefore, the theory is focused more on outcomes than concepts (Mitchell, 2018). For instance, a physician might recommend a patient medicine for a disease, however, it can turn out later that the placebo is correspondingly effective. Therefore, untrue ideas can seem to be working against the aim of a pragmatic test.
The last test is the ewe creativity test, which asserts that it isn’t merely the workability of a concept which makes it factual, but also its influence to produce healthier human circumstances (Mitchell, 2018). For instance, a learner may be lured to deduce that it is good to cheat since he/she may have obtained an improved grade on an examination through cheating. However, the ewe creativity test assists in realizing that though cheating may work temporarily, it won't produce healthier life circumstances in the long run.
References
Mitchell, H. B. (2018). Roots of Wisdom: A Tapestry of Philosophical Traditions . Cengage Learning.
