This operation guideline could be divided in two for easier, quicker and effective referencing and reporting. The best point for this division is to create a SOG that takes care of what happens in the command centre at the time information is received about a missing or injured crew and a second one to guide what happens on the ground at the site of incidence.
SOG for the Command Centre
The operations at the command centre at that time include the formulation of the team that will go for the rescue and identifying communication channels and equipment needed. The content of the SOG for what happens at the command centre during the response should start by setting a chain of command and responsibilities which will be done, indicating which team member is responsible for what aspect of the operation. It should also contain the actual modus operandi that is adopted when a response is activated after reception of notification that there is an incidence ( Lee , 2011) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In this case, at the command centre, the SOG will need to capture all the said definitions for the sake of clarity of the communication in the document. It will then go ahead and capture all the 11 points that are under activation of the rapid intervention action of Policy number 253. This means it will enumerate the roles assigned to members of the response team including identifying the RIT chief for every incidence. It will adhere to the initial dispatch of the level 1 RIT who will still be tasked with doing a comprehensive assessment and communicating back to the command post on what magnitude of response is needed for any particular incidence. The
second SOG can be tasked with the transition starting from when the team has been formulated and cover what happens on the ground.
SOG for Scene of Incidence
This will capture the conduct and roles expected to be played by the members of the RIT. It should also guide the type of association that will be there between the initial incidence response team and the RIT. Ideally, the firefighters involved in the initial response should not be involved in the intervention team. Therefore, the policy should capture how to raise the mayday and when to covert the incidence to a high priority rescue mission in which the primary focus of the whole team then becomes rescuing the missing firefighter (Burgess et al, 2020) . However, the primary mission ought not to be abandoned in its entirety and the policy should still put that into consideration. The manner to request for and source of additional necessities should be captured in this policy. For policy 253 this means all the facets that are capture in section 6.2 to the end will become the components of becoming part of the second policy. The channel for communication and media control are also important considerations that are better placed in the second policy as it will then guide the changes that may need to occur on the ground on as need be basis.
Conclusively, intervention, when a firefighter is hurt or missing, puts extra pressure and demand on the already high tension situations for the firefighting crew. For ease of reporting and administration, the SOG is better if divided into what occurs at the command centre and where the RIT is initiated and one that guides what happens at the site of the rescue.
References
Burgess, J. L., Hoppe-Jones, C., Griffin, S. C., Zhou, J. J., Gulotta, J. J., Wallentine, D. D., ... & Flahr, L. M. (2020). Evaluation of interventions to reduce firefighter exposures. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine , 62 (4), 279-288.
Lee, M. Rapid intervention teams: What firefighters should know. (2011, August 03). Retrieved December 03, 2020, from https://www.firerescue1.com/firefighter-training/articles/rapid-intervention-teams-what-firefighters-should-know-R2hqmtJoSoRCtzQ6/
