Part A
Viewing the footage of experiment rendered by Jane Elliot, there is drawing of reactions when one gets the actual perspective of the content. In her mission, she was forwarding the experiment to get reach of what she believed in in the making of inequality and racial prejudice effects ( Weisband & Thomas, 2015) . My first reaction to the experiment is that, I think she could have offered enough explanation to the comparison between the students that had blue eyes and those with brown eyes and the importance of the message to the conflict that is growing involving race.
The experiment had expression of various values and issues that are ethical. Dividing the students by eye colors brought a certain attention that without explanation leads to a serious misunderstanding. The exercise that she performed had a message on the effects of racism and inequality ( Weisband & Thomas, 2015) . She draws attention of one race that carries the human beings and that is the human race. Judging people as per the skin color is ridiculous like judging individual based on the color of the eyes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
When the real message is achieved at a 3 rd grade class, it is an appropriate message as it fosters into the future. It would be appropriate to study it today as long as the message is achieved effectively.
Part B
The Peggy McIntosh list draws an attention of the lifestyle that she would want to live ( McIntosh, 2004) . From the list, she wants a comfortable life for herself and children hence condemning racism or her race being questionable in her daily activty.
The reflection of privilege in society was accurate and will always be accurate as the issue being drawn is sensitive as the lifestyle of an individual is affected ( McIntosh, 2004) . Currently, no one would like to be treated unfairly hence its sensitive.
I think the issue of racism, sexism, and discrimination that is based on the religion or ethnicity has a primary individualism. The concept starts as an individual then extends to the society to be magnified to a big group.
References
https://nationalseedproject.org/white-privilege-unpacking-the-invisible-knapsack
McIntosh, P. (2004). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Race, class, and gender in the United States , 6 , 188-192.
Weisband, E., & Thomas, C. I. (2015). Groups as Identity Objects in American Political Culture. In Political Culture and the Making of Modern Nation-States (pp. 132-152). Routledge.
