Athletics in colleges has been growing into a multi-million-dollar industry has attracted more and more participants this year. This has become more competitive as the years move along, leading to more revenue generation and better performances. NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) was formed in the year 1906 as a result of the exploitive nature of the sports industry to protect young employees, and the policies are continuing to be implemented. As a result of college athletes’ higher ratings, the industry has grown as college universities generate so much revenue. College athletes need to get their payments based on the revenues of the university and other sales. This has resulted in discussions on college athletes’ payments. Some people argue that students get enough from scholarships with others claiming that payments can make them abandon their studies to participate in sports. This essay seeks to analyze the reasons behind making payments to college athletes. It does not stop there but also provides other people's views as to why the payment of college athletes should be disregarded.
Morgan (2012) notes that college athletes generate a lot of revenue to their institutions. These athletes should get a share of this amount since their existence contributes to the institution’s popularity. They earn revenue for the institutions, and therefore, it would not hurt to give some of the amounts back to them. The institution is required to care for their student-athletes by giving them free services. Many of these poor students find it hard to sustain their necessities and other expenses. Paying college athletes increases their chances of graduating. College sports should be taken of a profession, and therefore, college athletes should get payment for their participation. Another reason for paying college athletes is because they spend a lot of time practicing, which is almost equivalent to full- time job working hours. Their spending much time concentrating on athletics should be paid.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A big reason that is presented by people as to why athletes should not be paid is the fact that they are not professionals. They describe college athletes as people who are just trying to take advantage and therefore the claim that they should not be paid as they have not made it in life. Marchica & Derevensky (2016) argues that the reason as to why college students should not be paid is mainly because they will direct all their concentration to sports as compared to education. This will separate the institution from their main stated goal transforming them into more business-like and disrupting the learning aim. Giving college athletes money will also make them feel more superiority in terms of reputations, money, and power.
It should be understood that college athletes put much effort into athletics as they do in their studies, and therefore, they should be compensated. The scholarship money that they are offered only goes towards their studies, and therefore, their efforts for participating in college athletics need to be acknowledged. Johnson (2012) notes that these sports could not be there if college athletes never existed, and therefore, these individuals should get benefit from their sales. College athletes should be given opportunities for pursuing other opportunities that can help them. College athletes should be paid, considering the profit that the institution gets. They should also be allowed to engage in opportunities that bring them profits. As they participate in bringing popularity to the institution and to raise their revenue, the institution should ensure that they reward their efforts even if it is in a small way.
Annotated Bibliography
Marchica, L., & Derevensky, J. (2016). Fantasy sports: A growing concern among college student-athletes. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction , 14 (5), 635-645.
This article examines the participation of sports popularity and typically in higher institutions. Research shows that college students engaging these sports are likely to abandon their studies. The authors of this Journal are experienced and works in the Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology McGill University Montreal , Canada, and therefore, I find this article reliable and credible. The journal has also included data collected by NCAA concerning college- athletics.
Morgan, W. J. (2012). The Academic Reform of Intercollegiate Athletics. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport , 5 (1), 90-97.
This article concentrates on concerns about academic clustering and the rewarding of college athletes to maintain the status quo. There is a strong connection between the reformation of academics and the revenue generated by college athletes. Morgan works with the Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, and also the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. I, therefore, find this journal effective and credible in my research on paying the college athletes.
Johnson, D. A., & Acquaviva, J. (2012). Point/counterpoint: Paying college athletes. The Sport Journal , 15 (1).
This notion stresses on the paying of college athletes which has mostly discussed. The author has brought in the policies put in place by NCAA concerning payment of college athletes. The articles take a strategy on handling the issue of paying college athletes. The authors are professors in the United States Sports Management, making this article credible for my research.
References
Johnson, D. A., & Acquaviva, J. (2012). Point/counterpoint: Paying college athletes. The Sport Journal , 15 (1).
Marchica, L., & Derevensky, J. (2016). Fantasy sports: A growing concern among college student-athletes. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction , 14 (5), 635-645.
Morgan, W. J. (2012). The Academic Reform of Intercollegiate Athletics. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport , 5 (1), 90-97.
