Good business leaders are equipped with motivational skills, and they are in a position to direct others towards meeting common goals that have been set. As opposed to men, women are better suited as authoritative figures as they have mastered the skills necessary required to help in decision-making and adjudicating towards attaining set objectives. In the recent past, the number of women being involved in business activities has been increasing as the sector used to be male-dominated. Not only has the female gender become more vibrant but is also proving to be able to carry out quality leadership responsibilities as opposed to the men ( Alonso ‐ Almeida et al., 2015). By offering irrefutable evidence, this paper seeks to showcase that women make better leaders in the business sector. Ascertaining the leadership capabilities of women entails identifying the skills and techniques that they have (and employ) which makes them outstanding figures when they hold authoritative positions.
The slogan “the future is female” is common within many institutions which have seen an increase in female enrolment. In such organizations, the rate at which women are being involved in decision-making is increasing showcasing that they are bound to hold more leadership roles. Women, as opposed to men, have less ego (Sandberg, 2015). Thus, they can take the initiative when the need arises and get involved in tasks that are originally not designated for them (as leaders). On the other end, men are less willing to take charge even when doing so would make them outstanding leaders ( Edinger, 2017). This comes about as the male gender feels that doing the same tasks as their subordinates would be intimidating to them. To them, their sense of self-esteem and self-importance prevents them from leading by example as they highly value their self-worth in undertake certain activities. The impact of this ego is that it prevents them to relate better to those that they are leading ( Young, 2017) . Even though women have an ego, they efficiently manage it, and they are willing to interact with their subordinates (Sandberg, 2015). The advantage which comes with such a move is that they can be able to obtain ideas from inferior/junior members. Thus, the strategies that they employ in leadership receive a positive response due to good working relationships between them and the low-ranking staff members.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Women are also better listeners, and they are more creative as opposed to men. This quality makes them better leaders. Enhanced creativity comes about as women are willing to take advice and opinions from the most unlikely sources. Additionally, they exercise a high level of patience which boosts their listening abilities (Kiser, 2015). The fact that they are more creative means that they can easily develop a series of strategies that can be deployed toward solving challenges at the business institutions where they are the leaders ( Hacker, 2017). High listening capabilities help them to gather information that can be helpful in decision-making. Furthermore, the setbacks that junior members of business entities are facing are well-addressed as they are easily noted by women ( Heim et al., 2015) . On the contrary, men are generally not good listeners as they are impatient. Also, they are not as creative as they are not open to new ideas which can be blamed on the need to prove their superiority (Kiser, 2015). As a result, men who are business leaders rarely address the issues which their subordinates are facing. If they address the issue at hand, poor strategies which do not tackle the setbacks head-on are deployed ( Kadam, 2015) . This makes women better suited as leaders.
In addition to the above, women are better since there is less bravado associated with them and they are also very professional. In the business world, it is ubiquitous for men to mix pleasure and work whereby men are consistently integrating their personal lives with their duties. Therefore, they cannot be able to function adequately as their concentration levels are low ( Heim et al., 2015) . Men are easily distracted by aspects of their life out of work making them less effective as leaders (Hoobler et al., 2018). However, women are very professional as they exercise high levels of concentration when they are at their places of work. As, leaders, they are rarely distracted since they can easily maintain a balance between their official responsibilities and the personal lives out of the office. Bravado, which refers to the need to show defiance and bravery, is common with men ( Walker and Eller, 2016) . As leaders, women like to follow the outlined protocol and avoid unnecessary risks that might jeopardize the operations of the organizations which they are leading (Hoobler et al., 2018). On the other side, men like to show their defiance and their bravery in different undertakings ( Sedgwick, 2015) . The outcome of the consistent show of bravado is that the entities they are leading are exposed to threats which in most cases alter operations from being smooth.
All in all, women stand out as better business leaders when the emphasis is made on the illustrations given above. While men might have their strengths such as high levels of aggressiveness, women are better since they possess most of the skills that a leader requires. For instance, high levels of integrity and honesty are shown by women. They are also better team players due to the trait of cooperation. Being a leader entails establishing goals for the entity that one is leading and working towards meeting the set aspirations. Innovativeness also aids in meeting these goals in addition to the ability to build long-lasting relationships. While men can achieve this with a lot of strain, to most women these traits come naturally, and they efficiently use them to inform their actions.
References
Alonso ‐ Almeida, M. D. M., Fernández de Navarrete, F. C., & Rodriguez ‐ Pomeda, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility perception in business students as future managers: a multifactorial analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review , 24 (1), 1-17.
Edinger, E. F. (2017). Ego and archetype . Shambhala Publications.
Epstein, C. F., & Coser, R. L. (Eds.). (2018). Access to power: cross-national studies of women and elites . Routledge.
Hacker, S. (2017). Pleasure, power and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace . Routledge.
Heim, P., Hughes, T., & Golant, S. K. (2015). Hardball for women: Winning at the game of business . Penguin.
Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M., & Michel, E. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management , 44 (6), 2473-2499.
Kadam, A. (2015). The Role of Creativity and Innovation in Women Entrepreneurship Development. AADYA-Journal of Management and Technology (JMT) , 3 (2), 68-75.
Kiser, A. I. (2015). Workplace and leadership perceptions between men and women. Gender in Management: An International Journal , 30 (8), 598-612.
Sandberg, S. (2015). Lean in-Women, Work and the Will to Lead.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2015). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire . Columbia university press.
Walker, L. L., & Eller, J. L. (2016). Raising capital: Claims of masculinity among men on Match. com. Men and Masculinities , 19 (1), 42-63.
Young, I. M. (2017). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. In Gender and Justice (pp. 3-28). Routledge.
