Developing countries top the list of the least livable countries. Their economic situation is terrible due to overpopulation, harsh climate, geographic isolation, and unequal share of natural resources. A more significant percentage of its citizens suffer from hunger, diseases, and poverty. They do not have decent jobs and, those who are lucky enough to secure one earn little, which cannot afford essential commodities. Cultural values in developing countries dictate that women should help their men in taking care of their families. MNC’s take advantage of their situation and venture into these countries to lure women into accepting job offers. They are, however, exploited by being forced to work as prostitutes and barmaids. Since they are hardworking, they endure the challenges of supporting their families back at home.
Women in developing countries are more vulnerable to MNC's than men. Most of them are less educated, and their role in society has been defined. They have mainly been isolated from any activities outside their homes; therefore, whenever they get a chance to go and earn a living, they do not hesitate. The new slavery makes it even worse; women are illegally smuggled into first world countries with promises of better-paying jobs. The situation turns soar when their passports are stolen, and they are coerced into prostitution. For fear of deportation, they have no choice but to continue working to earn a living.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
MNC’s might be providing jobs for women, but what for whose benefit? Their selfish gains. If indeed they had a good motive towards helping the citizens from developing countries, all the profits generated would be directed to the third world countries to help ease their economic burdens. However, the US receives all the benefits despite the workers, especially women, being exploited. Furthermore, they know that most women from these countries are uneducated and can be easily manipulated into doing any job, the reason why they mainly hire them. If they meant well, the hiring procedure would be balanced according to gender. Most of these first world countries have advanced technologies, meaning that they have a lower demand for jobs. It leaves more questions than answers, why they hire a significant number of women, yet they do not have positions in their industries. I, therefore, do not agree with the scholars that hiring of women from developing countries is a positive gesture it is not because of the torture they undergo.
