Evaluation of the Organization’s Funding
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is a Multi-Sport Organization (MSO) global leader in fair play. WADA maintains a record list of prohibited methods and substances that provides the world code on anti-doping and ensures standards and standardized protocols of banned methods and substances globally. For the last four decades, WADA's funding has been by countries worldwide in different amounts. The sporting organizations get funding through government processes where governments reached a consensus to support 50% of WADA's budget. The funding is divided into five Olympic regions: Europe contributes 47.5%, Asia 20.46%, Americans 29%, Oceania 2.54%, and Africa at 0.5% (WADA, 2016). The consensus on funding WADA was reached at by governments independent of WADA through November 2000 during an intergovernmental consultative group on anti-doping in sports (IICGADS) forum. Governments' reconfirmation further confirmed the sponsorships during the 2001 3rd IICGADS meeting in South Africa. The 2003 Copenhagen declaration saw countries demonstrate their commitment to meeting regional shares allocated. The funding is guided by an agreed funding formula and funding allocation to categorize countries based on their gross domestic product (GDP), geographical size, and population sizes.
Advantages of the Sponsorship Relationships
WADA enjoys global support towards its mission, vision, and mandate because of the major sponsors being governments. The leaders of these nations have respective local programs in their countries to support anti-doping. Moreover, the multiple sponsors ensure continuous availability of funds for the organization, facilitating its continuous delivery on its mandate. The fact that the governments that sponsor organizations are spread out worldwide helps the organizations be financially stable due to the pooling of funds that reduces the risk. For instance, in the event of economic downturns, not all nations will be adversely affected. The sponsors often provide technical assistance and open support against doping through activities such as workshops and seminars, which is beneficial to the organization's work. The funding from different countries helps ensure a common standard for anti-doping in sports is reached globally, making it easy for the organization to operate globally. Therefore, the sporting organization has more money and is likely to get large contracts or amounts to cater to its project costs. The sponsorship relationships provide ease of access to information.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Disadvantages of the Sponsorship Relationships
Despite the numerous merits explained, there are also disadvantages the organization faces. For instance, governments that contribute large shares of funding concerning their counterparts feel entitled to special treatments whenever their citizen athletes have WADA issues. It may lead to a possible compromise on how the organization delivers its mandate in sports (Martensen & Møller, 2017). The contributions by nations are voluntary and pose a risk of adversely affecting the organization's operations if these nations decide to stop funding. Whereas there are agreements in place as to the amounts each nation and region should give, there are also ways put in place to allow for the countries that no longer wish to fund WADA can use to stop their funding. In the event nations from major region contributors opt-out, it will likely derail the organization's operations. The sponsorships' voluntary nature poses a risk of discontinuity in disapproval, which will hinder the organization's projects from achievement. The diverse nature of the sponsors could hamper creativity and diversity and lead to stagnation. The sports organization has to operate by the book all the time to receive the amounts they require. The relationship can lead to excessive dependence on funding from different governments. Political trends and the availability of funds could rapidly change and adversely affect the financing of the organization.
References
Martensen, C. K., & Møller, V. (2017). More money–better anti-doping? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 24(3) , 286-294.
WADA. (2016, March 08). Special Anti-Doping Research Fund Potential Nears USD 11.9 Million . Retrieved September 10, 2020, from World Anti-Doping Agency: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/2015-03/special-anti-doping-research-fund-potential-nears-usd-119-million.
