I was a member of a wedding committee that was planning a wedding for my close friend. As the treasurer, I was tasked with the responsibility of organizing the finances for the ceremony, including the setting up of a budget. The other members of the wedding committee included the chairman, the secretary, and four other committee members who were to support our activities. The committee was tasked with arranging for the bridal party attire and accessories, book officials, reserve the reception and ceremony venues, hire videographers and photographers, and establish a fitness routine, among other activities.
However, working as the treasurer, I soon found out that our budget was minimal, and we could not be able to afford most of the things that were needed for the wedding ceremony. This posed a great problem because we had to have more funds to be able to meet our projected expenditures. I encountered a problem with the group when I proposed that we had to raise member contributions to bridge the deficit that we had in our budget. Most members of the group disagreed with me because they thought it could have been expensive on their part. They proposed that we had rather reduce or do away with some items in our budget to bridge the deficit. The idea was not practical; to me, since we needed all the items in the budget so that we could make the wedding ceremony a success. We could not do without some items because we had planned for every item.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The problem was overcome by raising each member’s contributions to cover the deficit we had in our budget. However, it was no easy feat to achieve because it entailed intensive negotiation among the committee members in trying to resolve the problem in the best possible manner. After looking at all the possible angles, we concluded that the only possible way of meeting the deficit was to raise the member’s contributions. Even though most members had reservations with regard to the decision, it was decided that it was the only solution that could solve our problem.
To a great extent, most of the miscommunication came from me. I assumed that all members of the committee would be able to afford a raise in their contributions, given the seriousness of the problem. I also assumed that all would be in agreement with my suggestion of raising the contributions. As it were, not everyone was excited with my suggestions, and this led to disagreements amongst us with a view of arriving at a solution to the existing problem. On the other hand, I failed to inform them that every item on the budget was mandatory for the success of the wedding ceremony. It was a major factor that led to the disagreement since the other members thought that some budget items were dispensable.
To resolve the problem, I decided to engage everybody in coming up with a solution to the problem. Through the participation and contribution of each member in the discussion, we were able to come to an agreement on what needed to be done to salvage the situation. Though the solution was not favorable to everybody, members saw the need to adopt it because it was the best for the moment. If I were to relive the experience, I would do it differently by engaging all members of the committee in making decisions pertaining to all aspects of the ceremony. It would make it easier for people to agree to take a certain path without the need for unnecessary disagreements. This would be through efficient communication that would help everybody to offer their contributions in the discussions. Ultimately, the problem was resolved by members raising their contributions, which helped us meet the deficit and make the wedding a success.
