Your Name
Your Job Title
Your Address
City, State Zip Code
Your Phone Number
Your Email Address
Date
Recipient’s Contact Information
Legislator’s Name
Legislator’s Title
Legislator’s Address
City, State Zip Code
Dear sir/madam
The purpose of this letter is to communicate various aspects concerning my research and your impact as a legislature. The research project will focus on reviewing a critical issue in the society and obtain viable information concerning the issue. Engaging in a research project requires the implementation of different strategies and measures that may help to obtain the set goals and objectives. The research project will target members of the society, who are key players in providing quality and relevant information concerning the issue addressed in the study. Successful completion of the project will require the implementation of different research methods that will enhance the ability to acquire the intended information (Bendiscioli, 2019). The most important factor that enhances the success of a research project is adequate funding, which helps in enhancing the availability of resources required for the completion of the project.
The fact that you are a legislator with adequate knowledge regarding the implementation of different laws in the society, gives you the ability to become an advocate for my research. Considering that the research project will involve different engagements from the government and the public, a research advocate will help to promote effectiveness regarding the different interactions that would be necessary for the completion of the project. A research advocate has an important role in promoting effectiveness and efficiency in a research project (Soeding & Smith, 2017). The first step completed for my project involves obtaining funding from stakeholders and other professionals. However, it is important to note that government funding and approval is necessary for the successful implementation of the project. Research grants have a significant impact on defining the success of a given project (Hoffmann, Klein, & Pohl, 2019). In that case, I intend to seek government funding and approval, which will increase the success rate and the achievement of the set objectives.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The main reason you should be an advocate for my research project is the fact that you have adequate knowledge regarding the various laws and how the government operates in the process of obtaining research grants. In that case, you will be in a better position to assist in the process of requesting the funds considering the research objectives defined. Eagly (2016) maintains that an advocate for research has a significant role in assisting the researchers to obtain grants necessary for the effective completion of the projects. The second reason why it is important to have you as an advocate for my research involves the need to have an overseer for the project. For one to receive research grants, the government requires that a research project has an overseer, who ensures that all the processes undertaken maintain the required standards (Islam, Fremeth, & Marcus, 2018). In this case, you will be able to ensure that the project aligns with all the government requirements for effectiveness and efficiency.
Another significant reason for having you as my research advocate involves the ability to ensure that the project connects with the public. The project will require the involvement of the public considering that there will participate in the research to provide information. According to Prince and Mallabon (2019), an advocate helps to ensure that a researcher uses simple and correct terminologies, which are clear for all the audiences. In that case, your impact as an advocate will ensure that the project connects with the intended audiences and that the participants understand the key requirements for the given study. A successful project requires to have a proper level of engagement between the researcher and the audience. The engagement helps in ensuring that a researcher obtains vital information in the form of feedback from the audience. An advocate ensures that the researcher engages with the audience using appropriate language and research approaches.
The fact that government approval and funding is a vital aspect for this research, it is important that you will help in the process of requesting the funding. As an advocate for the research, your role in seeking approval from the government will help in ensuring that the project commences effectively. Additionally, initiating the process to seek government funding will help in laying the foundation for effectiveness and efficiency in the project (Tricco, Thomas, Antony, Rios, Robson, Pattani, & Straus, 2017). The adequate skills and knowledge associated with being a legislature will be helpful in the process of requesting funds from the government. As an advocate, you will advise on the primary aspects that should be addressed to ensure that the government offers grants and approvals for the project to commence. Additionally, your role as an advocate will help in the decision-making process regarding various aspects of the research project.
The major outcomes associated with your role as an advocate includes success in the project. The fact that you will help in the process of requesting research grants will enable the project to have adequate resources that are necessary for enhancing effectiveness. Adequate resources help in the implementation of appropriate measures and strategies necessary for promoting effectiveness in the project (Cartier, Creatore, Hoffman, & Potvin, 2018). Additionally, the project will impact the lives of people in the society considering that the main objective involves focusing on an issue that is relevant to the public. Obtaining information regarding the issue will help in providing insight into the specific needs of the society. In that case, you will be able to use the information and present it to a legislative body to discuss laws that would help solve the issues in society.
References
Bendiscioli, S. (2019). The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding. EMBO Reports , 20 (12), 5-17.
Cartier, Y., Creatore, M. I., Hoffman, S. J., & Potvin, L. (2018). Priority-setting in public health research funding organizations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders. Health Research Policy and Systems , 16 (1), 53.
Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance?. Journal of Social Issues , 72 (1), 199-222.
Hoffmann, S., Klein, J. T., & Pohl, C. (2019). Linking transdisciplinary research projects with science and practice at large: introducing insights from knowledge utilization. Environmental Science & Policy , 102 , 36-42.
Islam, M., Fremeth, A., & Marcus, A. (2018). Signaling by early-stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. Journal of Business Venturing , 33 (1), 35-51.
Prince, H., & Mallabon, L. (2019). Designing effective research projects in outdoor studies. Research Methods in Outdoor Studies , 33-44.
Soeding, E., & Smith, N. (2017, April). Internationalization Measures in Large Scale Research Projects. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 19, p. 16305).
Tricco, A. C., Thomas, S. M., Antony, J., Rios, P., Robson, R., Pattani, R., ... & Straus, S. E. (2017). Strategies to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants: a rapid scoping review. PloS One, 12 (1), 18-33.
