The article “They Say/ I Say” explains that academic writing is not only concerned with grammar, spelling, or sentence organization but also the expression of both personal and other people’s points of view. The authors of the depicted book, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstien, strongly advise writers to incorporate the ‘They say/ I say’ design in their work. The literature style demands that they begin by presenting what other people have already said about a subject and then proceed to give their views. The objective is to stimulate a debate among the audience and the readers of their work.
According to the article, the ‘They say/I say’ form of writing ensures that the writer makes an impact on the readers by stirring up a debate. I agree because the idea of challenging standard ways of thinking establishes a new perspective on specific issues. It also forms a recipe for a lively and non-flat piece of writing. The short-period suspense provided by the writer creates the need to continue reading.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In my experience, argumentation in writing stimulates healthy conflicts among individuals as they strive to find common ground as well as discover the right explanations for particular subjects. In cases where the writer has failed to identify a possible source of argument, individuals subsequently question the purpose of the writing.
The templates strategies used in learning materials have a fundamental responsibility in responding to what people say. The writers use templates to indicate where they stand in any of the debates. Evidence provides the information required, especially for disagreeing writers. They must acquire a wide range of information to ensure that they provide potent arguments and to protect their course from failing due to questionable assumptions or faulty evidence. In conclusion, academic writers should use the templates where necessary, depending on the nature of their responses.
