Neumann, I. D. (2008). Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. Journal of neuroendocrinology , 20 (6), 858-865. The article utilizes complementary discussed mythological processes therein, involving a variation in participation. It builds upon an assessment from other studies; however, for the assessor's laboratory, they factor an alternative approach concerning the OXT system manipulation therein, facilitating monitoring its patterns involving releasing extracellular fluid in the brain (at a particular region of interest). An example of an assessment involved the application of microdialysis during the observation period to suggest the capability to perform on conscious mice. The study was a qualitative one because it lacks a specific sample size to analyze the proposed concept; instead, it factors findings from different methodologies relating to the assessment (complementary methodological approaches). Neumann (2008) submits that one of the revelations within the study regards "anxiolytic and anti-stress effects of OXT, both in females and males, effects that were localized within the central amygdala and the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus." The hypothesis is brain oxytocin is a fundamental regulator of emotional and social behaviors for males and females. The independent variables are emotional and social behaviors, whereas the dependent variable is brain oxytocin (in both genders). Given it was a qualitative analysis, there was no use of statistical data; instead, the study was built upon previous research on the subject concerning the neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) to forge its argument. The findings supported the hypothesis with Neumann (2008), submitting that "receptor-mediated effects of OXT within the brain may have far-reaching implications for the complex regulation of emotionality, stress coping and social behaviors in both sexes." One assertion emphasizes the importance of OXT for mating-induced bonding for females. The author further suggests the brain OXT system has promising value regarding developing a new therapeutic approach when treating anxiety or depression-related ailments (abnormal social patterns for human beings). The author failed to issue any suggestion for future investigation on matters related to the assessed subject.
Quebbeman, A. J., & Rozell, E. J. (2002). Emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity as moderators of workplace aggression: The impact on behavior choice. Human Resource Management Review , 12 (1), 125-143. The article does not apply a quantitative analysis; instead, it does a qualitative assessment, thereby not having participants in the study. Contrastingly, the reading presents a model of emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity, placing them as workplace aggression moderators. It considers the mediating processes for workers that constitute behavioral decisions that arise from perceived injustices. The assessment applies interpersonal and intrapersonal skills regarding emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity to make the consideration mentioned above. According to Quebbeman & Rozell (2012), "the model explores the five components of emotional intelligence, including self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills." The methodology involves building on preexisting literature directly related to the subject, which facilitates the model to examine an individual's emotional intelligence degree. An assessment of the impact the mentioned skills against specific behavioral types following injustice perception accompanies the evaluation. The model equally "examines the impact that dispositional affectivity has on behavioral choices." The study's central hypothesis is "workers make behavioral choices arising from perceived injustices mainly applying the interpersonal and intrapersonal skills of "emotional intelligence" and dispositional affectivity" (Quebbeman & Rozell, 2012). The authors make subsequent analogies expounding on the tested hypothesis. The dependent variable is workplace aggression, while the independent variable is Emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity. There was no statistical analysis; however, the qualitative assessment involved building upon the associated texts accompanied by their examination against a workplace environment. The results of the model examination asserted support of the hypothesis with the author's advice for subsequent studies suggesting the need for further focus on critical variables like dispositional affectivity and emotional intelligence against their influence on workplace aggression. The authors suggest the need for increased literature for the former two. They equally advocate for using published arbitration decisions in future assessment, considering they posit detailed records concerning employee behavior. They also suggest using contextual variables from the workplace environment, accompanied by their influence on the workplace aggression process. Lastly, they suggest factoring the attributional process for future research assessment.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Takahashi, A., Flanigan, M. E., McEwen, B. S., & Russo, S. J. (2018). Aggression, social stress, and the immune system in humans and animal models. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience , 12 , 56. The article does a build-up assessment of findings from different studies as the foundation for the analysis therein lacks participants. The sample sizes in the factored studies vary as the materials applied in the respective surveys equally differ, transcending participation. The study is a qualitative one due to the building on research directly related to the assessment to conclude (it is a synthesis). The methodology involves explaining three concepts whereby the first argument is "while depression and aggression represent two fundamentally different behavioral and physiological responses to social stress, it is possible that some overlapped, as well as a distinct, pattern of immune signaling, may underlie both of them" (Takahashi et al., 2018). The second is "the necessity of studying animal models of maladaptive aggression induced by social stress (i.e., social isolation) for the understanding neuro-immune mechanism of aggression, which may be relevant to human aggression" (Takahashi et al., 2018). It contributes to the hypothesis, which posits "dysregulation of the immune system may be one of the mediators of social stress that produces aggression and/or depression" (Takahashi et al., 2018). The independent variables are aggression, social stress, and the immune system, while the dependent variable is humans accompanied by animal models. The data analysis involved findings from statistical analysis from other work directly connected to the subject to analyze the issued arguments. The results support the hypothesis with the authors suggesting the application of animal models against social stress uncovered neurobiological immune mechanisms. Such breakthroughs facilitated the progress of finding an anti-depressant drug. The authors made multiple suggestions for future research; firstly, they suggested further comprehension regarding the neural circuits that the immune system involved in aggressive patterns affects. Secondly, they suggested the need for considering individual differences in the immune system and the causal link with aggression. Lastly, they posited future research should find variations in immune function as utterly consequential of variating amounts of aggressive behavior.
The three articles bear apparent similarities and inherent differences in their formats. For the former, they develop upon preexisting research as they make qualitative analysis regarding behavior as a subject. Their methodologies are converging owing they lack primary sampling to assess the issued hypotheses. For the latter, on the other hand, the three articles differ in the application of the qualitative data. Of the three, it is the human resource journal that fails to factor concentration on behavioral manipulation and measures when assessing the offered arguments. The other two consider the mentioned aspect as they emphasize physiology, finding the assessment of specific neurons to analyze behavioral patterns. Lastly, the first article fails to issue recommendations for future research showing a considerable lack of vastness in the subject under analysis. It communicates the interdisciplinary collaboration from researchers from various faculties, propagating the differences blurring for content areas in health research. The main factor contributing to the three articles' variations was the subject under study, which relied on specific faculties, that is, health for the first and last while the second was human resource.
References
Neumann, I. D. (2008). Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. Journal of neuroendocrinology , 20 (6), 858-865.
Quebbeman, A. J., & Rozell, E. J. (2002). Emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity as moderators of workplace aggression: The impact on behavior choice. Human Resource Management Review , 12 (1), 125-143.
Takahashi, A., Flanigan, M. E., McEwen, B. S., & Russo, S. J. (2018). Aggression, social stress, and the immune system in humans and animal models. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience , 12 , 56.
