Scientific merit broadly evaluates whether research represents the criteria for a scientific study or not. Additionally, it assesses the representation of ethical scientific principles. The three main dimensions for scientific merit focuses on whether the review meets all the scientific hallmarks, contributes to theory, or advances the knowledge base of proper research. This paper assesses the scientific merit of Hofmann, Curtiss, Carpenter, and Kind's 2018 article Effects of Treatment of Depression on Quality of Life: A Meta-analysis, evaluating whether it meets all the three aspects of good science.
Firstly, the study advances the knowledge base on the importance of treating depression as a means of improving the quality of life using two main techniques; SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy). The study also contributes significantly to the theory surrounding the role of CBT and SSRIs in treating MDD (major depressive disorder). MDD is one of the most widespread mental conditions that affect approximately 16.2 percent of the U.S. population, significantly impacting their quality of life, satisfaction, economic status, subjective wellbeing, and daily activity functioning.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Lastly, the article meets all the scientific hallmarks and criteria for good research. For example, the study has a detailed background analysis that provides the basis for the research objectives and aims by identifying the existing knowledge and the gaps in research. Also, the investigation utilizes a practical methodology and data analyses to make inferences and deductions. In particular, a cross-sectional study design was used with articles searched from PsycINFO and PubMed databases. A total of 13articles probing approximately 4,286 patients and 24 articles examining roughly 1,969 patients were identified. Quantitative data analysis was conducted using a random effects model. From all the aspects mentioned above, it can be deduced that Hoffman, Curtiss, Carpenter, & Kind’s article meets all the standards of a scientific study.
Reference
Hofmann, S. G., Curtiss, J., Carpenter, J. K., & Kind, S. (2018). Effects of treatments for depression on quality of life: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, 46 (4), 265-286. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663193/
