Animal welfare simply refers to a state in which animals are subjected, the treatment in which they receive and the provision for the animal mental and physical needs (Spooner, 2014). Animals are subjected to intrinsic values and rights that hinder human beings to use them for their own self-interest.
This paper will aim at comparing and contrasting the intrinsic rights of farm animals with the economic ramifications of increased care, the paper will also provide a justification using scientific facts. To start with, there is a similarity between the rights of the environment and the rights of animals, both of the movement actually put recognition of the protection of the environment, they both oppose practices which are unsustainable, moreover, they both protect animals from the loss of their habitat (Wulczyn, 2015). Both environmental and animal rights work together to protect the endangered species in the world, animal rights welfares work together in the protection of few animal species such as the spotted owls, at the same time environmental activists work to see spotted protected because the species are very important in the survival of the web life.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Environmental and animal rights also differ in number of ways, this comes out when animal rights activists try as much as possible to protect the environment, but in case of a conflict between the need for environmental protection and individual animals, activists of animal right rights will end up choosing to protect the animals at the expense of protecting the environment because animals are somehow sentient and their lives cannot be infringed in order to protect forests and trees (Miligan, 2015). Some environmentalist may not oppose hunting of animals when they believe that it would not threaten the survival of few species, therefore, the interests and rights of animals are not of major concern to environmental activists.
References
Franzoni, E., Booker, S. A., Parthasarathy, S., Rehfeld, F., Grosser, S., Srivatsa, S., ... & Wulczyn, F. G. (2015). miR-128 regulates neuronal migration, outgrowth and intrinsic excitability via the intellectual disability gene Phf6. Elife , 4 , e04263.
Milligan, T. (2015). The political turn in animal rights. Politics and Animals , 1 (1), 6-15.
Spooner, J. M., Schuppli, C. A., & Fraser, D. (2014). Attitudes of Canadian citizens toward farm animal welfare: A qualitative study. Livestock Science , 163 , 150-158.
