Passage 1: An Argument
Passage 1 evidently presents an argument. It is vivid from the passage that Florence airs her perspective with regards to the subject matter. Readers of this passage would either contend or agree with her depending on the readers’ view point of the situation. As a matter of fact, medical men are usually not with patients round the clock yet they, in most cases of not all, have a clearer understanding of what goes around the patient. For instance, physicians usually do daily rounds lasting may be three to four hours a day, checking on each patient before they leave them in the hands of nurses, yet they know their cases. Not just the mere notion that they are deteriorating or improving, they understand every details about their past and present medical status. In fact they usually prognosticate the patient. Medical men always have the treatment plan for their patients even if they have to review them weekly. Furthermore, medical records exist which can be used as reference material to fill the gaps during the times when the medical man was away ( Yan et al., 2016 ). He can quickly be brought to speed by these notes. The idea that the second crucial role of a nurse is to take care to observe the effect of patient’s food is an implausible notion. It is a fact that airway is a priority with regards to patient management ( Clarke, 2014). To prioritize the effect of food eaten by the patient is just but a sheer argument and not a statement of fact. There are important things that nurses must report first among them being vital signs before we can worry about food ( Mok Wang & Liaw, 2015). Moreover, what is the work of the nutritionist as far as the effect of food is concerned.
Passage 2: An Explanation
Passage 2 offers an elaborate explanation of what it means to be an in charge (a leader). It is a sheer explanation since it outlines the duties of an in charge. It brings every fact on board with regards to the mandates of the person responsible for the success of a given department in the organization. As a matter of fact, in charge in every organization are expected to see to it that every member of the department a bid by the standards or measures stipulated in the doctrines of the institution to ensure quality of patient care (Bender, 2016). So it is explained in the passage that the in charge other than performing his or her duty must also oversee the actions of other employs. This is a valid explanation worldwide. Every leader has the role to ensure each employee is in the right job placement, even if delegation is the mode of present arrangement then each worker must do the right thing. These are statements that are applicable in any organization. Usually upon promotion to such high ranks, an outline of the duties of every in charge are pinned clearly explaining or rather stating what is expected of such an individual. It is always black and white that the in charge must supervise other employees and there is no argument about that, neither can it be twisted nor changed – it is applicable in that fashion all over the sphere. Therefore, regarding passage 2 as an argument would mean that every perspective from the very passage is admissible or permissible which would be far from the truth. The reality is that a unidirectional principle is applied for people in charge with regards to their mandate whether in the nursing department or in any other department (Bello, 2012).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Bello, S. M. (2012). Impact of ethical leadership on employee job performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science , 3 (11).
Bender, M. (2016). Clinical nurse leader integration into practice: developing theory to guide best practice. Journal of Professional Nursing , 32 (1), 32-40.
Clarke, C. (2014). Promoting the 6Cs of nursing in patient assessment. Nursing Standard , 28 (44), 52-59.
Mok, W. Q., Wang, W., & Liaw, S. Y. (2015). Vital signs monitoring to detect patient deterioration: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice , 21 , 91-98.
Yan, C., Rose, S., Rothberg, M. B., Mercer, M. B., Goodman, K., & Misra-Hebert, A. D. (2016). Physician, scribe, and patient perspectives on clinical scribes in primary care. Journal of general internal medicine , 31 (9), 990-995.
