The first key provision of the patriot act is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which sought to give law enforcement officers the authority to conduct searches without consents or knowledge of the owners involved (Gilbert, 2013). The second provision of the act is that it gave the federal government the authority to freeze financial assets belonging to suspected terror groups and individuals. The third provision of the act is on enhanced border security, as it gave the federal government the authority to restrict obtaining of visas for individuals that may have been terror suspects and their detention in the United States (Gilbert, 2013).
Based on the provisions of the patriot act, it is clear that the government is failing in its ability to balancing rights and homeland security. The provisions seek to infringe on rights, especially in areas of privacy (Kar, Crowsey, & Zale, 2013). An example can be seen from the fact that the act gives the law enforcement officers the express authority to conduct searches without consent. That means that the government may invade on an individual’s privacy in the event that it suspects him/her of engaging in terror activities. It is from this perspective that it can be argued that the government is failing in its approach to dealing with rights and homeland security.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
An analysis of the current situation indicates that the government may need to adopt a structured approach in which to engage relevant stakeholders on matters of security in a bid to ensuring that all interests are considered. The government is focusing on dealing with terrorism in a manner that can be considered as being rather non-effective, as it fails to consider the expectations of its citizens. That means that the government would need to focus on changing its approach to ensure that it maximizes on the process through which to advance interests from the different parties involved.
References
Gilbert, F. (2013). Demystifying the United States Patriot Act. Journal of Internet Law , 16 (8), 3-7.
Kar, B., Crowsey, R. C., & Zale, J. J. (2013). The myth of location privacy in the United States: Surveyed attitude versus current practices. The Professional Geographer , 65 (1), 47-64.