Part 1
| Autonomy | Beneficence |
|
Autonomy defines the authority a patient over deciding on the healthcare services they will receive. When the patient is under age or not in the right frame of mind, a parent or relative is allowed to make a decision. In the case of Mike and Joanne should make medical decisions for their children. |
The principle defines kindness, charity, mercy and doing good to others, qualities are care providers are required to acquire. The attending physician to James showed goodness by suggesting dialysis to help save James, it also shows mercy. |
| Nonmaleficence | Justice |
|
Nonmaleficence deals with avoiding causing harm to the patients whether intentional or not. The attending physician illustrated nonmaleficence by suggesting immediate dialysis to help James as his condition was deteriorating. |
The principle suggests that there should be a fairness element which is seen in all medical decisions. Mike was struggling with the decision on whether it would be just for his son Samuel to lose a kidney so that the other son James would live. |
Part 2
The principles of biomedical ethics are aligned towards establishing productive healthcare based both on Science and Christianity. Among the four principalities, includes relevant procedures that ensure there is safety in handling patients alongside effective prevention and cure of infections. The existing ethos shows the degree of the concerns of the medical stakeholders to ensure there is efficiency in the delivery of healthcare services (Jakubowski et al., 2017, p. 391). In the case study of Healing and Autonomy, justice comes out as one of the most pressing ideas among the four principles. It is aligned towards realizing a favourable platform for reforms creation of sustainable approaches towards prevention and cure of infections. Ethics stands out as a major standard that informs the public on reliable infrastructure for reforms and values sharpening accuracy in the scientific analysis in handling infections.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Justice is one of the most reliable pillars that ensure decency within the biomedical operations. Among the four principles; autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, Christianity prefers justice as an underlying factor that provides platforms for reforms in engaging stakeholders in efficiency in medical operations (Trothen, 2017, p. 84). It also informs the public on the level of efficiency required to create sustainability in establishing a favourable platform for proper medical examination. Furthermore, it creates equality in the scientific examination and ensures that standards are enhanced within the creation of values and the adoption of policies that engage stakeholders. Besides, it is through the information based on justice for efficiency is aligned towards realizing the need for reforms in the scientific analysis of infections. Adopting a reliable framework for an effective pillar is one of the major issues that created an efficient platform for reforms and sanity in organizational efficiency. Christianity prefers the use of justice so that there are standards for a transformed society, elevating the nature of corporate growth and development.
The case study would be applicable in the presence of justice as one of the major principles within the biomedical ethics such that there is decency in the scientific approach in analyzing the nature of infections. Christianity is a major factor that determines the extent to which efficiency is enhanced and values streamlined to fit within the current context of science both in diagnosis prescription. Reliability in biomedical ethics is one of the underlying pillars that ensure justice as a key factor in the principality in biomedical ethics is engaged among stakeholders. Standards within a scientific approach involving biomedical analysis of infections are effectively integrated through the provision of justice in creating a stable framework for reforms (Jakubowski et al., 2017, p. 391). Justice is next to autonomy in evaluating the hierarchy with which the four principles are engaged and discussed in the pretext of the biomedical analysis of infection. Biomedical analysis operates alongside the fundamental values of Christianity so that sanity in science is enhanced.
Christianity preference is the application of justice, alongside autonomy so that there are reforms that engage stakeholders in harnessing values and roles in scientific evaluations. Christian concerns on the role of justice become part of the central issues that improve the structure of social growth and ensure science acts in the best interest of the individuals who appreciate the value for research. Biomedical standards are based on the existing ethos aligned towards the four principles, ensuring sanity in a scientific approach and engaging stakeholders in effective pillars for healthcare reforms (Cahill, 2017, p. 12). Medical policies are pronounced actively within the biomedical ethics so that justice mainstreams operations as a Christian preference. Justice is next to autonomy, then nonmaleficence, followed by beneficence, providing the necessary pillar for an effective scientific approach in medical evaluation. The case study shows the extent to which justice is a Christian preference such that it improves biomedical operations.
References
Cahill, L. S. (2017). Public Theology and Bioethics. A Companion to Public Theology . doi:10.1163/9789004336063_018
Jakubowski, H., Xie, J., Kumar Mitra, A., Ghooi, R., Hosseinkhani, S., Alipour, M., … Obiero, G. (2017). The Global Ethics Corner: foundations, beliefs, and the teaching of biomedical and scientific ethics around the world. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education , 45 (5), 385-395. doi:10.1002/bmb.21059
Trothen, T. (2017). Moral Bioenhancement through An Intersectional Theo-Ethical Lens: Refocusing on Divine Image-Bearing and Interdependence. Religions , 8 (5), 84. doi:10.3390/rel8050084
