Since the terrorist attacks in September 2001 in the United States, the government stated devising strict measures to make its borders secure. This essay aims to explore border policing under the present administration in the United States of America.
Making the United States border, less open and more secure would cost the American citizens. Unfortunately, the economics of border governance postulate that the construction of the wall by Donald Trump’s government would make the border less secure. Frequently the migrants pay coyotes thousands of dollars to get guidance across the border illegally. The building of the wall is likely to create an opportunity for the cartels to manage the undocumented immigration business, which will make them more wealthy ( Nichols et al ., 2018). The Department of Defense has a primary shared goal with the Department of Homeland Security, which is to safeguard the American land and its citizens. The Department of Defense is tasked with different roles, which include the commissioning of the members of the armed forces and equipment to carry out emergency technological response missions. On emergency occasions, the country Department of Defense, along with the United States armed forces may be called following a need for support by the civil authorities, and this function describes the strategy of national defense as the primary duty of the Department of Defense.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In 2016, more restrictive immigration enforcement policies were campaigned by Donald Trump, including the need for more robust border security and an end to birthright citizenship along with mass deportations. Ever since Trump became president, there has been increased anxiety among the immigrant as a result of increased border policing in the United States of America.
References
Nichols, V. C., LeBrón, A. M., & Pedraza, F. I. (2018). Policing us sick: The health of Latinos in an era of heightened deportations and racialized policing. PS: Political Science & Politics , 51 (02), 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517002384
