Climate change has been a significant concern around the world. The main discussion that exists about global warming is whether it is exaggerated or a hoax. An exaggeration is a comment that indicates that something is good or bad than its actual appearance. A trick is a malicious joke about a situation. The issues that are revealed attract the attention of the world because they affect many people. The climate change around the world is a sensitive issue that should be handled with absolute concern. The ambassadors hold meetings every year to discuss on the climate changes. The climate changes have developed into global warming as a result of the consistent rise in the temperatures. There are two groups including the proponents and supporters in the world who have different perceptions about global warming. The opponents perceive that global warming is a hoax because the propositions are meant to raise money. The proponents believe that global warming is not an exaggeration. Global warming is seen as an exaggeration or a hoax because the climate predictions did not come to pass, the presumptions on the rising of the seas are not successful and the improvement of the survival rates of bears.
The weather predictions on the occurrence of high temperatures in the world were not successful. The proponents of global warming claim that there were no high temperatures in 2014 as the scientists had predicted. The proponents challenge the scientists that there could be severe climatic conditions in 2014 which did not occur. The high temperatures meant that the living things could not survive due to the harsh changes in the climate (Comeau et al., 2011). Currently, people cannot reflect on the presumptions that were made in 2014 could happen. The supporters have to formulate reasons for the changes that occurred to prevent the high temperatures. Another illustration that the predictions weather was not auspicious is the recorded ice in different seas. In 2014, there happened record ice in Antarctica, but the proponent of weather has proposed that the temperatures would be high (Comeau et al., 2011). The sea ice was significant that the exploration of climate change stuck on it. In the same year, the ice the Arctic Ocean regained its ice (Comeau et al., 2011). Lake Superior had ice for nine months in 2014 which was a record in history. People expected that the ice could melt and living things could not survive due to the high temperature (Comeau et al., 2011). Global warming is a hoax because the weather predictions were not successful.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Another illustration that shows the 2014 predictions were not successful is the presence of snow in various parts of the world. The regions of the Northern Hemisphere experienced snow which was contradictory to the presumptions on high humidity. The Northern region experienced snow in September, October and November which was a record in the world history (Monaghan et al., 2007). The other parts that experienced snow were in Eurasia and North America. North America experienced snow in November and set a record (Monaghan et al., 2007). The proponents claimed that snow could not fall in the Northern part of America (Monaghan et al., 2007). The final illustration on unsuccessful weather predictions is that cold temperatures were still recorded in 2014. The cold temperatures were experienced in parts of the Polar Vortex (Inhofe, 2012) . The cold wave in the northern region of the United States occurred in 2014. It was a severe disaster that prolonged to the winter season during the year (Inhofe, 2012) . The cold temperatures extended to Canada, northern and eastern locations of America. The cold temperatures were as a result of changes that occurred in the Northern Pole Vortex (Inhofe, 2012) . The forecasts made by the proponents were not in line with the actual weather changes, and this gives evidence that climate change is a hoax.
The proponents had forecasted that the oceans would rise in an abnormal manner, but actual changes are below the expectations of people. Al Gore had predicted that the water bodies would increase to 20 feet and 2100 above the sea level ( De Lange and Carter, 2014) . According to De Lange and Carter (2014), the oceans increased by only one foot. Over 80% of the tide indicators showed that the oceans levels have slightly increased which is contradictory to the proponents’ presumptions ( De Lange and Carter, 2014) . Many of the tide indicators show little or no increase in the ocean levels. The tides were set two decades ago but report a slight rise in the standards of the water bodies ( De Lange and Carter, 2014) .
The proponents had predicted that the bears would decrease due to the consistent changes in the weather patterns which caused the decrease in ice in the water bodies (Stern and Laidre, 2016) . In 2007, it was recorded that there was an improvement in the survival rates of the bears (Stern and Laidre, 2016) . According to Stern and Laidre (2016), the population of the polar bears increased to 900 in 2010. The population of the polar bears in 2012 grew as compared to other years (Stern and Laidre, 2016) . The body temperatures of the polar bears were normal, and their response to the environment had not changed. The continuous survival of the polar bears indicates that global warming does not have a significant effect on their existence (Stern and Laidre, 2016) . The polar bears cannot survive in intense climatic conditions. The current global warming situation is not as severe as indicated by the weather proponents (Stern and Laidre, 2016) . The research suggested that the climate change is an exaggeration and is not the way the proponents claim it is severe.
In conclusion, the continuous changes in the climate have led to global warming around the world. The weather proponents perceive that global warming is not an exaggeration. It is evident that global warming is a hoax because the weather predictions on high temperatures were not successful, the oceans have increased partially, and the population of the polar bear has increased. People should not depend on the projections made by the weather proponents.
References
Comeau, A. M., Li, W. K., Tremblay, J. É., Carmack, E. C., & Lovejoy, C. (2011). Arctic Ocean microbial community structure before and after the 2007 record sea ice minimum. 6 (11), e27492. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22096583
De Lange, W. P., & Carter, R. M. (2014). Sea-level change: Living with uncertainty . The Global Warming Policy Foundation. Retrieved from https://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/handle/10289/9443
Inhofe, J. M. (2012). The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future .
Monaghan, A. J., Bromwich, D. H., Fogt, R. L., Wang, S. H., Mayewski, P. A., Dixon, D. A., ... & Kaspari, S. D. (2006). Insignificant change in Antarctic snowfall since the International Geophysical Year. Science , 313 (5788), 827-831. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16902135
Stern, H. L., & Laidre, K. L. (2016). Sea-ice indicators of polar bear habitat. The Cryosphere , 10 (5), 2027-2041. Retrieved from https://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/2027/2016/tc-10-2027-2016.pdf
