Response to Colleague 1
The case of Andrea presented by colleague 1 reflects the complexity in dealing with mental and psychological disorders using standard diagnostic and treatment strategies. Review of the APA (2013) guidelines on diagnosis of mental psychological disorders show that individual and environmental factors play a crucial role in shaping perceptions of disorders. Observations made by colleague 1 about Andrea’s predicament provide clarity of the need to give socio-cultural factors due significance when performing a diagnosis. Nevertheless, Andrea’s case illustrates the challenges psychiatrics face when dealing with patients with comorbidities. The presence of more than one problem coupled with physiological factors make it difficult even in situations where integrating a cultural framework may have yielded a better diagnosis.
Response to Colleague 2
Colleague 2 raised important observations about Andrea’s condition. One is made to question whether her mental distress is a related to PTSD following the attack at the workplace, or a mere manifestation of paranoia. The post serves to highlight the importance of ethnicity, race, sex, spiritual, familial make-up, cultural customs in determining an individual’s worldview of different phenomena. Review of Andrea’s case raises a number of questions. For instance, would a man in her predicament show similar signs and higher levels of anxiety and depression? Is her worsening mental state a result of the past events or socio-cultural factors in her environment? Such questions create difficulties, but are essential in performing a proper diagnosis.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Response to Colleague 3
In the post by colleague 3, the article reviewed alternatively presents cognition and memory as dependent on both lived and unlived experiences. According to Hock (2013), the study by Loftus appears to suggest that information retrieved from memory does not need to have come from active participation. Cognition entails capture of information through bot active and passive ways. The article advances the concept of the subconscious that collects information, later retrieved after a trigger is affected, yet the individual is not aware of the existence of such information.
Response to Colleague 4
The post by colleague 4 recognizes the relationship between cognition and memory and nutrition. The article by Zamroziewicz and Barby (2016) reviewed in the post advances the argument that individuals are responsible for the wellbeing of their brain in relation to cognition and memory. While the effects of aging are recognized as inevitable, colleague 4 noted that article establishes the importance of nutrition in the management of the negative effects of aging on cognition and memory.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Hock, R. R. (2013). Forty studies that changed psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Chapter IV, "Intelligence, Cognition, and Memory" Reading 16: Thanks for the Memories!
Zamroziewicz, M., & Barby, A. K. (2016, June 6). Nutritional cognitive neuroscience: Innovations for healthy brain aging. Front Neurosci , 10 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00240
