Summary
Selectively social politics: The differing roles of media use on political discussion. Mass Communication & Society
The modern environment has had a tremendous increase in access to technological devices. Political information is available to people using various media, making them always updated. This article reveals that people are continually using media sources such as radio and television to get details regarding the political arena. The main aim of this article is to bring out the results of a study that revolved around the use of media sources and the frequency of political discussions. The study showed that the user background determines the frequency of engaging in political discussions. The background included sex, political opinion, political, social identity, age, and political content affinity (Ponder & Haridakis, 2015). This article greatly contributes to the field of psychology as it delves into factors that influence behavior. People tend to get an interest in politics; it is continuously available on social media platforms. Therefore, their behavior is triggered by what they get or read from the media.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Invited editorial: Let's do it again: A call for replications in Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research
This article is an editorial that provides an overview of other sources that were available in the Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. The editorial provides a discussion of some of the factors that have led to the replication crisis. It also provides some of the techniques that people have been putting in place to manage the crisis. In general, science is facing a replicability crisis that needs a solution for future generations to enjoy (Edlund, 2016). There is no subsequent research to support what is already available in the scientific world. The replication crisis is characterized by falsification, questionable research practices, and also the pressure of promotion. All these factors make it easy to report inaccurate information that will affect public decision-making processes. The field of psychology depends on research. Therefore, this article brings out the problems that scientists face before they declare research accurate for decision making.
Part 2
What can we expect to learn in the future?
People's understanding of human behavior is imperfect and has some flaws. As such, psychology's future is skewed on one side of handling reports and research that is not accurate. This outcome implies that in the future, psychological conclusions and recommendations will not be effective. Learning psychology will revolve around understanding stress and frustrations among humans. The world is constantly becoming problematic in terms of the issues that people face. Therefore, more research will focus on stress and frustrations than the normal thoughts and behavior that people exhibit. Future psychology will also need people to develop a better understanding of emotions. This will be a way of promoting efficiency and empowering people in various fields of interest. Psychologists will also focus on being teachers and philosophers as they desire to deal with the replication crisis.
What are the possible problems we may face with psychology in the future?
Most people will study psychology and fail to pursue it as a career. This is because the era of doing psychology as a passion has gone. People now want to get degrees and develop a satisfaction that they have attained higher education requirements. Also, psychology-related employment sectors are out of reach. Most graduates now practice psychology without being well conversant with what is available in the market. Such incidences will lead to erroneous research outcomes hence promoting poor recommendations. The fact that research is not backed up by subsequent hypothesis will make it challenging to study human behavior to a great extent.
References
Edlund, J. E. (2016). “Invited editorial: Let's do it again: A call for replications in Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research.” Psychology Net, 2(1), 1-5.
Ponder, J. D., & Haridakis, P. (2015). Selectively social politics: The differing roles of media Use on political discussion. Mass Communication and Society , 18 (3), 281-302.
