In contamination risk assessment, there are various steps that must be followed in relation to distinct cases. The health agency must first interpret the contamination evidence underlined by various sources. Primarily, there are significant sources of information that pose as a public health risk and therefore the agency must interpret them adequately. The next step is assessing the exposure and risk. Assessments indicate the population that is likely to be affected by the contamination. There is also the definition of the potential risks to the community. For instance, unsustainable business operations present a risk to all members of the community while substandard products are a threat to a certain segment of the population. In this regard, steps are necessary to ensure that the government and other health agents have the right strategies to address the contamination risk. NRDAR (Natural Resource Damage Assessment Restoration) is a government authority mandated to restore natural resources harmed because of hazardous substance emissions and oil spills into the environment. The agency is responsible for monitoring environmental impacts on the coast and throughout the interior (Forth et al., 2017). It derives its authority for the Department of Interior. One of the restoration programs undertaken by NRDAR is located at Jacks Creek where migratory birds had been affected negatively by the economic activities in the area. Concisely, NRDAR is concerned that migratory birds are using contaminated water. The major economic activity is smelting, which has been very devastating to the water resources in the area. Consequently, NRDAR focused on the investigation of the source of water pollutants through a multiagency collaboration headed by the Fisheries and Water Services agency (Wu & Wang, 2018). Currently, the agency is involved in the restoration and replacement of natural resources in the vicinity of the loss and in acquiring similar resources in the area. The court ruling in Corrosion Fittings vs EPA was justified because it is essential that the EPA is primarily focused on scientific findings. Although scientific finds are essential in policy formulation and implementation, it is essential to note that most of the environmental factors with major implications are overlooked. Therefore, the toothpick data is relevant because it is more dangerous to the public when compared to other factors such as the use of asbestos in the prevention of unnecessary deaths. Nonetheless, EPA has the right to ban products that are detrimental to the environment and the issue of public health.
References
Forth, H. P., Mitchelmore, C. L., Morris, J. M., & Lipton, J. (2017). Characterization of oil and water accommodated fractions used to conduct aquatic toxicity testing in support of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill natural resource damage assessment. Environmental toxicology and chemistry , 36 (6), 1450-1459.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Wu, D., & Wang, S. (2018). Environment damage assessment: A literature review using social network analysis. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal , 24 (4), 904-924.
