Social disorganization theory best explains Detroit's increase in poverty and crime. One might argue that all individuals are the same; they have similar motives and desires. Therefore, social disorganization theory best highlights why different communities might experience higher crime rates than others. By focusing on a larger social environment, social disorganization theory explains why high crime and poverty rates are linked to issues that are much bigger than their immediate social environment, be it their family, school, or peer groups ( Bruinsma, 2016) . Indeed, key distinct factors within each community or society have a significant impact on why some are poorer than others and why some are highly likely to engage in crime.
A majority of people from high crime areas do not engage in crime. Nonetheless, a person's environment has a major impact on criminality. According to the social disorganization theory, criminality can be explained by highlighting community differences. Consequently, high crime rates are highly likely in large communities, deprived economically, and have a dense multi-unit system of housing ( Kubrin & Mioduszewski, 2019) . Furthermore, the frequency with which people can move in and out of an area is has a significant influence on crime. Most importantly, the level of family disruption, such as single-parent families and high divorce rates, tends to perpetuate crime. Similarly, a community that lacks the skills and resources to assist one another is more vulnerable to crime.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Arrests are not a valid indicator of crime rates. Suppose an area has more arrests, it does not mean that the area has more crime. According to statistics, the most common form of arrests often involves drunkenness ( Joh, 2017) . Other arrests may involve loitering and disorderly conduct. In the real sense, these people are not engaging in any crime. Therefore, there is no association between crime and such arrests. Choosing to do so will provide misleading information.
References
Bruinsma, G. (2016). Proliferation of crime causation theories in an era of fragmentation: Reflections on the current state of criminological theory. European Journal of Criminology , 13 (6), 659-676.
Joh, E. E. (2017). Feeding the machine: Policing, crime data, & algorithms. Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. , 26 , 287.
Kubrin, C. E., & Mioduszewski, M. D. (2019). Social Disorganization Theory: Past, Present and Future. In Handbook on Crime and Deviance (pp. 197-211). Springer, Cham.
