Introduction
The battle on drugs and the international drug control framework has beset criminal justice systems and impacted the most vulnerable populace without the capability to ease the predicament of consumption or trafficking in North America. Various areas have made remarkable signs of progress. The whole approach to drug abuse pandemic is leading to a decrease in the number of American citizens abusing drugs in a decade. The use of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine is also reducing (Hora et al., 2018). Therefore, this paper focuses on how the current criminal justice policy from a management perspective will impact future drug policies
Contemporary Criminal Justice Policy from a Management Perspective and Future Drug Policies in North America
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The criminal justice policy has given a room for the implementation of the Affordable Care Act program. This program is essential because it will necessitate a public health approach to drug abuse mayhem in America by giving the mandate to the insurance companies to handle addiction the same way they would with any other ailment. It will ensure comprehensive health insurance improvements that will provide health insurance is obtainable to many addicts. It will also ensure lesser health costs, warranty health care preferences and improve the value of health care of the addicts.
Another impact is the changing of the dialogue when it comes to proof based criminal-justice improvement. The extension of programs like drug courts that redirect non-violent criminals into treatment rather than detention is one instance. The fact that the management signed the fair sentence act into law; they eventually reduced the longstanding difference amid crack and powder cocaine judgment and eradicated the first compulsory minimum drug statute in 40 years. The attorney general announced the way in which the department of criminal justice addressed required minimums for non-violent criminals and added that sympathetic release would also be a historical event.
It is significant to note that the general intelligence in the criminal justice system has enabled it to focus into the future concerning drug abuse policy by actually spending more on the treatment and prevention of drug and substance abuse. They spend more on treatment and prevention than it does on drug statute enforcement and incarceration. This synthesis does not incorporate interdiction or hold up for the intercontinental programs. The fact is we spend a lot per annum on the demand declination efforts available. For instance, on the whole strategy Colombia approximately above eight years or in sum counternarcotics help for Mexico Merida inventiveness.
The fact that presently, only one in ten citizens of the United States who require treatment ever get it and that a lot of people succumbing from drug-induced deaths has been far too high, the management has ensured that we have to do a better work of restructuring drug policies as a public health matter and not only a criminal justice predicament. By so doing, we are going on to allow science and proof to be our principle and guide.
Moreover, we as the management have requested an increment of the budget for treatment purposes. The control of criminal justice system holds up for prevention is still very strong, and we've incorporated the Congress to make sure they go on supporting vital prevention programs such as the Drug-Free Communities program that ensure support for many community associations at the ground level.
The Intended and Unintended Consequences of both Political and Legal Decisions
Intended Consequences
Prime Minister Bill is not a fanatic of cannabis. Therefore, it may not be possible for him to legalize heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine usage anytime soon. The labor Chief Andrew Little is also reserved on the matter. His thought was that decriminalization could work as a policy and the legalization is not a decision for the labor ministry. Among the minute political parties, there is suppleness as. The minister for health is focused on being involved in the appraisal of the legal fines. Some members of the Congress are anticipating for a referendum on the legalization of heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine. The Act head David Seymour is not clear in favor of the legalization but very doubtful about the advantages of the status quo. Some are in for a broader and broader debate on the legalization (Chandler et al. 2013). To date, the Green party is alone in outwardly supporting control for both recreational and medical use of the drugs. Its latest policy requires the prioritization of drug education, treatment, and intervention.
Unintended Consequences
The current literature emphasizes unintended negative impacts. They are normally well known for the idea of condemning prohibitionists' policies than for the entire policy assessment. Besides, the negative repercussions are very significant. On the other hand, there are also substantial unintended repercussions of particular interventions that are worth taking into consideration. For instance, treatment of drug users which is generally known as a demand-side program. Its advantages arise from the reduction in drug use and connected health dangers. Some politicians and legal officers from the criminal justice department are for this, but others see that it will consume much money to treat the drug users; therefore, they have identified an insurance programme that will care for health matters of the drug users and provide counseling and guidance for them.
The minister for labor is also not ready to legalize drug sale labor. It is because there is symmetric unintended repercussion from the incarceration of substance dealers since most of them who involve in these kinds of sales are heavy users of the drugs like heroin marijuana and meth among others. Harsh enforcement of the law is vivid and has an unintended negative repercussion in the creation of obstructions to treatment search through criminal courts have turned into a way for entry into treatment. It may be recorded as an unintended positive impact in that the objective of the legal authorities unlike the jury and the prosecutors is to deal with the proximate of the issue. Therefore, an unintended consequence of treatment is a reduction of the use of drugs.
How Society Is Affected By Corruption That Use Power Within The Commercialization Of Drugs And Justice Systems .
Corruption is a worldwide problem found in almost all countries. Evidence revealed that it impacts the poor a lot more than the rich. It suppresses economic development and redirects desperately required money from healthcare, education and other public departments. Money from drugs is a lot, and many rich people are involved in this business, therefore, because of their power and influence, they can manipulate their ways into continuing with this illegal business. Hence, corruption has led to the commercialization of drug thus affecting the society through:
An increase of health dangers linked to drug usage
Banning has an effect on the kind and quality of particular goods consumed and on consumption characteristics. The health risk is portrayed on the fact that illegal sources of drugs are of unknown quality, purity and strength. It lacks the assurance of legal drugs or lawfully synchronized equivalent for medical usage. The increase in the price of heroin can make users inject themselves rather than safer ways of use like smoking. The economies of illegal trade tend to push markets on concentrated drugs and preparation of drugs linked with health dangers. Criminalization can enhance risks by pushing the use into unhygienic, and unmonitored surroundings and atmosphere.
Fuel Crime
The links between the usage of drugs and criminal activities are complicated and arguable amid criminologists. The battles amid great demand for drugs and the statutes that forbid them from being produced, supplied and used creates pressure on distribution in a market that is demand directed. It leads to inflation of prices that can result in lucrative chances for criminal entrepreneurs. There is convincing proof that well organized illegal activities have exploited the probabilities generated by banning of drug usage. The second effect is that increased costs motivate acquisitive criminal activities amid the low-income reliant users fundraising to uphold their behavior.
Marginalizing of the Rights of Human
In North America, and many other countries, drug enforcement has ended up in very lethal abuse of human rights. These include torture and mistreatment by police, judicial corporal punishment for drug criminals. There are also executions as well as extrajudicial killings: uninformed detention and the defiance of essential health services. Not examined drug-enforcement activities can as well worsen systematic unfairness against individuals involved in the usage of drugs. It also obstructs access to crucial medicines and prevents the obtaining of harm-reduction and HIV treatment services for the marginalized highly in danger populace.
References
Chandler, R. K., Fletcher, B. W., & Volkow, N. D. (2013). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. Jama, 301(2), 183-190.
Hora, P. F., Schma, W. G., & Rosenthal, J. T. (2018). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame L. Rev., 74, 439.
