The essay is a critical analysis of a particular study. It aims at assessing both the strengths and weakness of the study by keenly examining its approaches, results, and conclusions. Based on the above perspectives, the essay provides non-integrated answers to some of the questions.
1. Are the experimental methods adequately described? Were the experimental design and methods appropriate for the research question? Explain.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Concerning the article, the experimental approaches are adequately described. Most importantly, both the experimental methods and design were entirely appropriate for the research question. The article describes the use of sample and questionnaires as the best approach for the research. The methods provide the required information about the research question, and hence they are suitable for the research question.
2. Was the target sample population appropriate for this study? Does the sample of this study allow for generalizability of results? Explain.
The sample population was entirely appropriate for the above study as explained in the article. The samples give the investigation an opportunity to generalize the results. It was easier for the study to use the results in predicting future satisfaction and the future experiences of college peers. More so, the sample population made it appropriate for the investigation to comprehend whether social experiences have any connection to do with the effect of extraversion on the satisfaction of college.
3. What measures were used to assess personality? Are the measurements valid and reliable? What other measures would you have liked to see included in the study? Explain.
Self-report tests were among the measures that were used to assess personality. They were generally reliable and valid for the case study. The self-report tests were subjective as well as susceptible to the complete approach overlap with satisfaction and extraversion (Harris et al., 2017). I would propose other measures such as rating scales, behavioral assessment, and interviews. The proposed standards would provide personal facts from a broad perspective.
4. Are the procedures relevant, clear and appropriate? Is there enough detail in the procedures to enable replication? Explain.
The procedures used are relevant, much clear and very appropriate. More so the processes have enough details to facilitate replication. They have an offers a guideline on how common choices dramatically affects the reliability of the results, the guidelines on when to stop and how to analyze the data of the experiment.
5. Are the statistical methods appropriate for the data and research design? Explain.
The statistical approaches are appropriate for both research and data design. The statistical methods are vital since they guide the researcher towards making a valid conclusion about the case study. The approach also helps in the derivation of essential facts from the research.
6. Are the findings generalizable? To whom? What limitations exist in generalizing the results? Explain.
The findings were generalizable to college peer men. Some of the limitations the challenge of establishing whether there is a systematic difference between the control group that is governed by statistical evidence and the experiment itself. The other weakness is the problem of identifying the degree of truth at which the research has been conducted. It is not easy to note the exact degree of facts concerning how the experiment was done. Some researchers are biased and corrupt and hence not trustworthy.
Reference
Harris, K., English, T., Harms, P. D., Gross, J. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2017). Why are Extraverts more Satisfied? Personality, Social Experiences, and Subjective Well ‐ being in College. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 170-186.
