Depersonalization disorder affects one’s conduct, perception, and emotions ( Medford et al., 2016). The condition alters ones perception of self and experiences. It thus comes with a detachment feeling, away from one’s self or one mental state, more like the consciousness of a dream. The diagnosis of the condition can be confirmed after a full laboratory test and analysis that rules out an over-all or substance health status. It thus calls for a comprehensive psychiatric examination ( Medford et al., 2016) . The examination involves a clinical evaluation by the use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Dissociative Disorder, an extensive evaluation process.
DSM-5 Diagnostic
DSM-5 has seen enhanced features to apply across various settings. A critical characteristic of DSM-5 is that it is used by clinicians and scholars to diagnose and categorize perceptual conditions. Its primary aim is to facilitate an unbiased evaluation of present symptoms in multiple clinical environments; primary care, private practice, clinical, consultation-liaison, partial hospital, outpatient, and inpatient. It indicates various symptoms which must be founded in addition to a list of conditions, disorders, and signs that must be excluded to fulfill specific diagnosis.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A research carried out by Casey et al. (2013) states that most disease definitions are reliant on the DSM-5. The research further holds that, DSM-5 is purely a diagnostic technique, and it differentiates multiple mental conditions as discrete entities. The study attempts to get diverse opinions from various investigators into DSM-5 as a dependable analytical technique. At the same time, the American Psychiatric Association provides detailed and general features of the diagnostic tool. It states that the criticism and limitations of the tool are mainly characterized in an individual’s dysfunction that is reflected in the developmental process, functioning, and an underlying mental state. The research labels the tool a “mental disorder analysis and examination” that is holistic and effective. In their study, On the way to DSM-5, Hebebrand and Buitelaar (2011) attempt to dissect and understand the journey to DSM by comparing linking it to ICD-11. According to the two researchers, both DSM-5 and ICD – 11 do not take into account etiological factors.
Summary of The Two Primary Research Articles
Casey et al. (2013) attest that DSM-5is a reliable diagnostic tool that is critical in differentiating diverse mental states. It provides various mental conditions that point to normal or abnormal functioning. The research attempts to answer the question of DSM-5’s effectiveness in light with mental disorders examination and analysis.
On the way to DSM-5 provides an overview of the journey to the development of DSM-5 by comparing its functioning with other closely related diagnostic techniques such as ICD-11. However, DSM-5, according to Hebebrand and Buiterlaar (2011) research, does not focus on the origins or causes of abnormal mental conditions. The increased insight into the various heterogeneity and complexity leads to an underlying psychiatric mental condition that leaves little option to define their core criteria following empiric evidence.
A different study attempts to understand why the DSM-5 has over-reached itself and is fatal. The research reaches out to weigh on the various options available for clinicians and healthcare personnel to use the DSM-5 in its diagnostic medications.
Conclusion
The DSM-5 is one of the main diagnostic tools used in the diagnosis of depersonalization disorder, a condition that is mainly characterized by a strange perception of self. As a diagnostic tool, DSM-5 has unique characteristics setting it apart from other commonly used evaluation and examination techniques. As compared to its newer version, ICD-11, DSM-5 is limited and does not cover all diseases affecting one’s psychological state. ICD-11 examines and analyses all mental disorders in addition to medical diseases. However, despite controversies, as seen in the above research materials, DSM-5 remains a useful and reliable tool to diagnose depersonalization disorder and other common mental conditions.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). DSM III: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders . American Psychiatric Association.
Casey, B. J., Craddock, N., Cuthbert, B. N., Hyman, S. E., Lee, F. S., & Ressler, K. J. (2013). DSM-5 and RDoC: progress in psychiatry research?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 14 (11), 810.
Gornall, J. (2013). DSM-5: a fatal diagnosis?. Bmj , 346 , f3256.
Hebebrand, J., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2011). On the way to DSM-V. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00787-010-0157-x
Medford, N., Sierra, M., Stringaris, A., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2016). Emotional experience and awareness of self: functional MRI studies of depersonalization disorder. Frontiers in psychology , 7 , 432. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00432/full
