Evaluation of the Purpose Statement
The purpose statement for the journal article by Wilhelmy et al, (2016) is concise but comprehensive. It indicates the purpose of the study as being based on the intention to establish how and why employment interviewer use impression management (IM). This is based on the understanding that the interviewers aforesaid do overwhelmingly use IM within the course of conducting their interviews. However, nor comprehensive research has been undertaken in an attempt to understand exactly how IM is used and to what end. Further, different mediums and perspective of IM may be used towards the achievement of different ends (Wilhelmy et al, 2016). This, therefore also forms part of the phenomenon being investigated by the research reported in the said article through qualitative methodology.
Theory, Problem, and Purpose Alignment
The instant study as reported not only has a sound theoretical basis, problem and also a purpose, but also the three are well aligned. The theory upon which the research is based is that IM is definitely widely used within interviews by interviewers. This solid theory makes the foundation of the research, without which the entire process would be untenable. The problem, on the other hand, lies in the fact that albeit it is known that IM is applied within interviews specifically by the interviewers, it is not properly established exactly how and why (Wilhelmy et al, 2016) . Further, the correlation between the how and the why is also not properly established through research. This leaves an information gap within the understanding of the theory. It is this gap that is meant to be filled through the purpose of the theory, which is to establish how and why this IM is applied. From the foregoing, there is an express alignment between the theory, problem, and purpose of the research. Finally, the purpose statement clearly indicates that the methodology for research is a qualitative study. The intended outcome also indicated within the purpose statement as being to establish a conceptual model and a taxonomy of exactly how and why interviewers use IM when conducting interviews (Wilhelmy et al, 2016) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Reflection on the Relationship between Research and Social Change
There is no absolute formula or established concept on how society ought to be like. Therefore, society keeps on changing based on internal and external factors. From an internal perspective, society will change as it seeks to better itself. From an external perspective, society will change as it seeks to adapt to external factors or even survive them. It is this process of change in social order that is referred to as social change. Social change can be considered from a minute approach to society such as a family and also keep expanding to include a community and even an entire nation. Every society aspires to be better and all forms of social change are geared towards this. However, intentions are not always reflected in the outcome of an activity or event. Therefore, social changes can be undertaken intended for good but end up having adverse ramifications in the long run. This is where research comes in as a fundamental factor in social change. Through research, it is possible to establish the probable outcome of a certain route of social change, even before the same it taken. This will safeguard a society from taking the wrong path, albeit the intentions may be positive. Further, just as in a project, the outcome of a process once undertaken may not always be understood and contingencies happen along the way. Once again, research enables the understanding of what social change processes have gone right and what may have gone wrong. This will enable the society to understand their social status as well as the way forward. This makes research primary and fundamental to positive social change.
Reference
Wilhelmy, A., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., & Truxillo, D. M. (2016). How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101 (3), 313-332. doi:10.1037/apl0000046
