Developed countries should prohibit the proliferation of nuclear weapons due to the massive destruction they can cause. They are the most devastating, cruel, and retaliatory weapons ever produced. Unlike all other weapons in both size and destruction, nuclear weapons are unique, permanent, and with a genetically detrimental radioactive fallout (Sagan & Scott, 2011). The humanitarian effects of nuclear weapons should greatly worry all countries worldwide as the previous history in use and testing nuclear bombs has amply shown their inadmissible humanitarian implications. Significantly, nuclear weapons affect human life, the environment, socio-economic growth, and future generations' wellbeing. We, therefore, need strongly to understand the urgency of this challenge and firmly agree that all approaches and attempts to nuclear disarmament, most significantly for developing countries, must be accompanied by a sense of the devastating effects of nuclear weapons.
A detonation of nuclear bombs into or around a populated area will cause widespread death and harm to human health, as well as enduring damage to the atmosphere and civil order – as a consequence of the blast wave, extreme heat, pollution, and radioactive contamination (McClellan & Roger, 2020). Disposal of nuclear detonation and waste in or near the population could also cause a profound political and social upheaval as the reconstruction of infrastructure and the regeneration of fiscal, industrial, communications, hospitals, and schools will take several decades.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The continued proliferation of nuclear weapons can propagate thermal radiation. A single nuclear exploding can emit a heavy thermal radiation pulse and ignite and burn vast fields, unlike traditional blasting. In certain situations, the explosion-ignited fires can become a firestorm, prohibiting survivors' escape. Although it is impossible to determine precisely, the thermal effects induced by a nuclear blast are likely to cause significant losses. In comparison, nuclear explosions cause comparable air-blast results as conventional explosives (Miller & Nicholas, 2017). Shock waves can impair humans by rupturing eardrums or lungs or by hurling individuals at high heights. Still, most of the injuries are attributed to the destruction of constructions and airborne debris. In many parts of the world, nuclear weapons use or testing has left an unfair legacy of severe medical and environmental effects disproportionately affecting women and children, owing to the enduring effects of disclosure to ionizing emission.
The proliferation of nuclear weapons should be avoided since no government or international organization may discuss, in an acceptable way, the imminent humanitarian catastrophe or the enduring effects of nuclear weapons explosion in a heavily populated region to offer appropriate relief to those affected. Due to enormous suffering and devastation from a nuclear explosion, such capabilities could not possibly be developed. However, efforts would nevertheless be sufficient to alleviate the consequences of an incident involving a homemade nuclear device explosion.
In conclusion, it is crucial to study the various imminent and sustained effects of the testing and use of nuclear weapons because they remind us of these artilleries' uniqueness. This research is also a vital foundation for humanitarian response and preparedness, and it is important to preserve the human rights of the affected persons and communities. Proof of the humanitarian repercussions of nuclear weapons is important for determining the legitimacy of their usage under international philanthropic law and offers a more general point of entry for negotiations on nuclear demobilization and nuclear non-proliferation. Evidence of damage sustained by the testing and use of nuclear arms is of renewed interest in a world where the possibility of nuclear weapons in use is growing. The only tactic to ensure that nuclear weapons are not used again is by restricting and removing them.
References
McClellan, R. O. (2020). Health effects of nuclear weapons and releases of radioactive materials. Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents , 707-743.
Miller, N. L. (2017). Why nuclear energy programs rarely lead to proliferation. International Security , 42 (2), 40-77.
Sagan, S. D. (2011). The causes of nuclear weapons proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science , 14 , 225-244.