Introduction
Most states in the world have laws that protect smokers from discrimination. However, smoking has been associated with various health hazards hence unlike non-smoker, smokers have not been completely protected. Some employers have even made no-smoking as one o the requirement that a candidate must have in order to get employed with some of them prohibiting their employee to smoke and declaring the workplace as a no-smoking zone. This paper seeks to ascertain whether an employer is right on making no-smoking a condition to hire.
Smoking bans are public policies and occupational safety and health regulations in workplaces. In some countries, smoking has been enshrined in criminal laws hence becoming legal. However, some people have criticized the move as unethical in that it is trying to control people’s freedom. It is hard to control every individual behavior hence enforcing the smoke ban is not an easy practice.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Right to work is a general concept which states that every human being has a right to work. The right to work has been recognized in the universal declaration of Human rights and international human rights law. This, therefore, means that everybody deserves the opportunity to work and should not be discriminated against based on their race, gender, background social status or even political affiliation. Some states have laws that legalize employer to inquire whether an individual is a smoker before hiring. However, some state has prohibited discrimination based individual right to smoke provided they do it in a designated place.
Conclusion
All employee has right to work and should not be discriminated upon for whatever reason. It is legal for employers to be concerned with an individual smoking status. They should, therefore, formulate policies that will guide their employees how, where and when they are supposed to smoke.
