Rationale for the Methods
The methodology used in collection of outcome data is a qualitative research design where it is the best fit for the research. It is evident that the design will help gain a greater understanding of the problem at hand. The issue of childhood obesity is one that has received widespread attention from professionals in public health. As a result, there have been extensive studies conducted to bring about appropriate interventions to reduce the prevalence and incidence of the health issue (van Nassau et al., 2015). Through the use of qualitative research design the primary aim is to explore the issue further and document perceptions as well as outcomes of a population who are subject of the implementation plan. The research may also identify the trends and opinions on the various interventions that will be enforced.
Ways the Outcome Measures Evaluate Extent Project Objectives are Achieved
The outcome measures will evaluate the extent the objectives of the project are achieved through a number of techniques. In this case, the evaluation measures will assess the impacts that the particular program has hard on the target population. Comparison is appropriate way of identifying if the objectives of the project were achieved. For instance, the schools where the intervention physical activity and nutritional diets were introduced are compared to those where the practice remained the same (de Silva-Sanigorski et al., 2010). A critical assessment of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes among the target population should be assessed to identify the extent of achieving the objectives. In this measure, the behavioral outcomes at the end of the project will be compared to the practices that the population demonstrated. The timeline for achieving the objectives of the project will be assessed to identify how the resources were utilized.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
How the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence
The outcomes of the project will be measured and evaluated based on significant evidence that include the use of tests or instruments. In this case, the outcomes will be measured by setting up key infrastructure, leadership, priorities, and timeline for implementing the project. This will be followed by establishing appropriate monitoring, surveillance, and summative evaluation efforts within the project (van Nassau et al., 2015). Data integral for the assessment of the project will be collected on a monthly basis until the end of the 6months to one year using valid and reliable instruments that can be harmonized with the intervention plan. New data collection techniques will be incorporated to address gaps in the research (Sallis, & Glanz, 2009). For instance, parent surveys may be utilized to assess the home environment in the enforcement of the project objectives in terms of physical activities and nutritional diet. It is important to ensure the standards of utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy in the measurement of outcomes. This will help ensure the validity, reliability, and applicability of the results.
Strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results
It is evident that concluding that there were no significant changes to the implementation plan does not provide new insight on the available knowledge on interventions for reducing childhood obesity. In this regard, it is important to conduct an evaluation of the process, by analyzing the different factors that led to the negative results (van Nassau et al., 2015). This practice may be used to develop changes for the program in such a way to achieve the desired outcomes. If there are methodological issues, it is imperative that starting all over again will be the most appropriate option. However, if there is nothing wrong then there is no need to begin the project afresh, instead an alternative may be implemented.
Implications for Practice and Future Research
Public health workers should offer the community members with an appropriate obesity reduction program that includes physical activities and nutritional diets. It is evident that the intervention has significant impact in reducing sedentary behavior that may lead to multiple chronic comorbidities. The implementation of the Tran-theoretical Model of Behavior Change incorporates systematic steps of eradicating unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and reinforcing new ones within a short duration (Sallis, & Glanz, 2009). The inclusion of numerous the stakeholders such as the target population, parents and caregivers, school staff, and public health workers is essential to successful achievement of the project objectives. Future research will look into assessing various ways of minimizing the effect of the barrier for change. Additionally, studies will evaluate whether individual choice in developing healthy diets and physical activities can help improve the outcomes further.
References
de Silva-Sanigorski, A., Prosser, L., Carpenter, L., Honisett, S., Gibbs, L., Moodie, M., ... & Waters, E. (2010). Evaluation of the childhood obesity prevention program Kids-'Go for your life'. BMC Public Health, 10 (1), 288-295.
Sallis, J. F., & Glanz, K. (2009). Physical activity and food environments: solutions to the obesity epidemic. The Milbank Quarterly, 87 (1), 123-154.
van Nassau, F., Singh, A. S., van Mechelen, W., Brug, J., & Chinapaw, M. J. (2015). Implementation evaluation of school-based obesity prevention programmes in youth; how, what and why? Public Health Nutrition, 18 (9), 1531-1534.
