Domestic and family violence comes as a result of the dispensation of dictatorship and superiority complex over one partner in a marital relationship. The victimizer may decide to use a range of abuses to dictate and proclaim power over their partner. The abuse that may be conveyed in such a case may be economical, physical, sexual or even manipulation to one’s children. The victimizer might also consider separating their partner from their close persons and those who might provide assistance in one way or the other. Many studies and assessments have been carried out to identify the risk factors and the individuals who have a high possibility of family violence. The most shared feature is an inequity of influence and authority. Nonetheless, neither the victims nor the victimizers fall into distinct group. Domestic violence is spread all over age, ethnicity, level of income and also academic intensities. Things that instigate or the causes of violence by an abuser depends on some background factors of the victimizer, such as, poverty, witness of abuse as a child, as well as abusive former partners (Coker, 2016)
Causes and consequences
The most joint and shared causes of family violence include; inequity of power, previous abusive relationships, deprived living conditions, unemployment, mental and physical infirmity. Others include recent separations and divorces, social isolations from close persons, abuse as a child, as well as childhood witness and experience of family violence. Despite the fact that victimizers have a common root to their problem, it is of importance to have it in mind that victimizers opt for violence in order to get something out of their relationship. Risk causes may show an incremented probability of violence in a relationship, but this does not mean that the relationship is destined for doom or to become violent for the rest of the years. Nonetheless, the violence cannot be justified by resigning to the perception that it took place when the abuser was in a sightless rage such that they couldn’t take charge.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
There are some factors that may fuel violence in a person or might indicate an increased probability that makes a given individual opt for violence. Some of those factors include; the abuse of drugs and alcohol. Alcohol and drugs are highly linked with a great probability that the user will be part of violence maybe as a victim, victimizer, or even both. Dishonest use of drugs by the family members elevates the death potentials of the female partner by their counterpart in a 28-fold factor. Furthermore, increased use of drugs is connected to a 16-times huge risk of suicidal behavior, this risk is way high than the one that is prevalent in the abuse of individual substance. From a report that assessed the linkage that existed in chosen social-economic risk causes and injuries emanating from family violence, drug use in the case of a male, as conveyed by the female, was the most rigid and robust predictor of serious injuries. In approximation, more than half of the reports indicated that the male partner was into drugs or was befuddled during violence. The fact that alcohol and drug abuse fuel instances of violence, it is yet to be determined if it is the direct, indirect, or the intermediate causal factor of the negativity that prevails in a relationship. Injuries emanating from family violence may exist for a long time or even the entire life of the lesser privileged party. Another long term effect may be imposed to kids. Children may develop a lot of negativities towards marriage and in the cases where they become adults; they may extend that violence to their spouses.
In the endeavors of assessing family violence, there are some factors that professionals ought to be aware of. The first thing that should be contemplated is the, background life of the abuser, this is important because the victimizer may have extended violence either from his life as a child or in their previous relationship. The other important thing is the financial and economic situation of the family, lack of meeting the most basic needs due to economic difficulties may be a big contributor of violence. Lastly, the most important item to look at is alcohol and drug use of the family members, alcohol and drug use have been categorized as one of the major contributors of violence all over the globe.
Many theories have been fashioned to help explain the prevalence and reasons of violence in families and societies. Cultural violence theory claims that, in huge and pluralistic societies, some subcultures consent norms and beliefs that license violence to a higher point than the principal culture. Hence, family violence will transpire more often in societies that clench huge cases of violence than those with low cases.
Ecological theory on the other hand tries to connect family violence to the wider social surrounding. Part of this is the culture, official and relaxed social systems of the family, the nearer family set as well as the circumstance and history of the family. This form of outline establishes a foundation for a risk theory of family violence as indicated by the criteria (Weldon, 2015).
In conclusion, family violence is an array of victimizing activities by a single or dual partners in any given family or close relationship. family violence takes quite a considerable number of forms including physical hostility which comprises of hitting, biting, slapping, and hurting with an object among others. furthermore, it can take the form of emotion and sex. The principle and chief cause of family violence is contingent to the background of the victimizer which includes; childhood exposure to violence, unemployment, and living in poverty and deprived conditions
References
Coker, D. (2016). Domestic Violence and Social Justice. Violence Against Women , 22 (12), 1426-1437. doi: 10.1177/1077801215625851
Weldon, S. (2015). Implicit Theories in Intimate Partner Violence Sex Offenders: an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal Of Family Violence , 31 (3), 289-302. doi: 10.1007/s10896-015-9774-y
