The report exemplifies how Palestine National Authority (PNA), initiates procedures that aim at eradicating corruption in Palestine, especially at the administrative level. Such measures undertaken include the involvement of the anti-corruption commission that assists the PNA in dealing with the increased rate of corruption at the administrative level in Palestine. However, the emergence of various challenges both internal and external factors have slowed down the operation of PNA. Nonetheless, the report also expounds on the comparison of various nations on how it deals with corruption such as Denmark, Turkey, and Singapore. However, the contrast in comparison is that policies applied to agencies of the different countries are not similar hence making it difficult to obtain a unilateral conclusion. However, the cultural similarities of Turkey and Palestine are the same hence enabling the PNA to implement such policies that deal with corruption especially at an administrative level. Furthermore, the recommendations objectives link the need for various independent government agencies to work together with an anti-corruption unit to eliminate the vise of corruption in Palestine. In addition, conducting transactions in an open manner enhances accountability thereby lowering the cases of corruption and consequently initiating hefty fines on those found guilty in the criminal court.
Findings
The Palestine National Authority (PNA) has encountered several challenges when dealing with the vise of fighting administrative corruption. For instance, the presence of various non-organization organizations that operates under international laws makes it difficult for the Palestine to investigate them without obtaining a search warrant and in conformity with the international laws. However, according to the research conducted by the Palestine coalition for accountability and integrity (AMAN), most of the citizens take a bribe or give out bribe when obtaining services that they are not supposed to pay. In addition, the anti-corruption agencies indulge in corruption themselves hence making it difficult for the country to eradicate corruption, especially at the administrative level. The widespread issuance of bribe menace has become a normal duty for the citizens acquiring services hence increasing the level of corruption in the country. According to transparency international center, they depict how PNA indulges in corruption instead of eliminating corruption as when they are bribed they become reluctant in performing their duties of anti-corruption. However, inadequate policies and mechanisms in security to punish those that indulge in corruption in Palestine have made the situation to escalate thus making it a major concern for the Palestine government.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Despite the population of Denmark deemed higher than that of Palestine, they lack anti-corruption agencies to reduce the corruption menace and equipped strategies to eradicate corruption. Denmark mainly depends on the judiciary and through institutions such as parliament that amends a law that suits them thus obtaining minimal impact when dealing with fraud. Despite the Denmark judiciary setting a high penalty of up to six years on people found guilty of corruption, the rate of bribery is high thus making it difficult to convict the offenders. However, the drastic measures undertaken through legislation such as the creation of investigative agencies would expedite control of corruption. Besides, the ethical conducts of Denmark culture advocate for anti-corruption especially among the public officers thus leading to integrity and training of people who would eradicate the corruption cases.
In Singapore, fraud scandals are minimal as more anti-corruption agencies are alert and perform their work diligently despite intimidation from powerful people who harbor corruption at the administrative level. The country has among the best policies that deal with corruption in Europe hence the presence of minimal bribe cases like those found guilty of corruption incur heavy fine and penalty. Besides, the strategy implemented by various agencies, legislators, and judiciary enables Denmark to adopt laws and implement them without fears.
In Turkey, that embraces similar culture to Palestine and with high population compared to other countries, the cases of corruption are heard urgently to provide justice and incriminate the guilty party. Such measures have facilitated lower percentages of corruption cases with the urgency to eradicate fraud, especially at the administration level. However, the world ranking of Turkey on initiating anti-corruption guidelines have recorded a lower metric on Improvement as the European laws advocated for prevention at the expenses of prosecution of corrupt individuals. Moreover, the citizens of Turkey perceive bribery claims as a major concern after unemployment hence the government initiating a range of agencies to deal with the menace.
The political impeding the implementation of anti-corruption cases hence making it difficult for the PNA to conduct their duties. The situation is because the agencies dealing with the anti-corruption cases conspire with politicians thereby subverting justice at administration level and favoring them when they indulge in fraud. However, the efforts of PNA to create corruption court in conjunction with the government facilitated the process of fighting corruption at the administration level and increasing audit by the state. Such scenarios enhance accountability, transparency, and accessibility of financial report of institutions hence eliminating the vise of corruption.
Conclusion
Since corruption remains a major challenge to the Palestine government and other nations, strengthening institutions and providing them with adequate resources will reduce the corruption cases. Ultimately, Palestine illustrates failures on how they combat fraud, and lack of effective policies and laws should be implemented to strengthen the judiciary and handle the corrupt cases urgently. PNA requires constant evaluation to avoid conspiring with politicians and other leaders at the administrative level to reduce the cases of corruption. Finally, the comparison of other countries on how they deal with corruption indicates that for corruption to end it needs a combination of various agencies and institutions including the government for the fraud and bribery cases to end.
