Sifted through the prism of Italian neo-realism, The Battle of Algiers refers to a steady depiction of how high-minded archetypes get crushed underfoot in the hotness of warfare. The Battle of Algiers is pertinent to contemporary spectators not considerably in the specificity of the past events it records but in the universality of what they signify. Indeed, in 2004, the American government performed distinctive analyses of the film as an instructive work in the consequences of the Iraq invasion to demonstrate how to conquer in a war against terrorists and be defeated in the battle of ideas. Even though Gillo Pontecorvo, the film director, demonstrates empathies for the Algerians against the French, he repels the urge to lionize Algerian and demonize the French. The movie’s detached point of view, which is presented in a documentary style, is close to the film’s objective. Restraining the partisan prejudice enables the film to stand out of past era and be illustrative not merely of this battle but all battles.
The Battle of Algiers serves more like a summary of the ostensible war than a typical character-grounded story. Even though the narrative follows a small number of persons, no one is accorded exhaustive backstories nor is given any form of the arch a person may anticipate within a motion picture. Rather, they exist to enable varying points of view to be depicted. For instance, the rebellious National Liberation Front is embodied by the violent, fiery, Ali La Pointe, and a more rational El-hadi Jafar. 1 The main French role is the leader of the paratroopers battling against the resistance, Lieutenant-Colonel Mathieu.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The movie opens in the year 1954 with the initial happenings of the Algerian Warfare of Freedom within the metropolitan of Algiers. 2 The rebellion leads to aggression by killing police; a counter-rebellion, headed by Mathieu, reacts with identical vigor, even utilizing an explosive to damage an alleged opposition hide-out. This demonstrates the main theme of the movie, which is violence. The repression and violence cycle intensifies with the National Liberation Front partaking in terrorism, whereas the paratroopers use undiscriminating, swift killings. The Battle of Algiers ends in the year 1957 with the killing of the final follower of the National Liberation Front’s higher level. 3 Nevertheless, this is an incident of conquering the fight and be defeated in the warfare. Even though the rebellion was terminated during the year 1957, it reappeared several years in the future, and Algeria acquired its freedom during the year 1962. The Battle of Algiers , created in 1966, was effective in reflecting on the Algiers’ Battle from this point of view.
Gillo Pontecorvo’s filmography reveals a fondness for documentaries, and in The Battle of Algiers, he chooses a straightforward, non-melodramatic technique. Through the use of the artificial documentary style, Pontecorvo successfully creates a third-person omniscient point of view for the audience. 4 Notwithstanding this impartiality, there exist instants of emotional influence. Conceivably, the most notable happens after three Arab females, dressed as Colonists, aim at sites in the metropolis’s European area for terrorism (the restaurant/bar, the bus station, and dance hall). The audience observes the females’ unwillingness while planting the explosives and check out the eyes of individuals they recognize will perish shortly; nevertheless, they execute their obligation. 5
Excepting Jean Martin, no actor in this movie is professional. The director sought the inexperience, which will originate from actors fresh in the craftsmanship. Also, Pontecorvo did not wish to risk crushing the sense of genuineness by using a performer certain audiences may identify from somewhere else. For instance, Saadi Yacef, whose biographies offered the screenplay foundation, was cast to act a marginally fictionalized form of himself. 6 The other central roles are complexes of real-life partakers. 7 In a different enhancement to the movie’s authenticity, it was filmed on-site in Algiers, with numerous scenes within the Casbah happening where real events took place. With shooting occurring just ten years after the warfare, it was conceivable to realize authenticity without “dressing up” numerous zones. 8
Pontecorvo recorded on location in the thin streets and markets of the Casbah, the typical Muslim segment of Algiers, using non-professional performers. The movie director sought to generate a feeling of realism. Marcello Gatti, the film cinematographer, captured the movie in white and black, depending on older movie stock, and he also handheld cameras to create the feel and look of a documentary. 9 The impression was improved by his utilization of announcements airing on the National Liberation Front and the French radio. The Battle of Algiers looks very similar to a documentary that U.S ads for the film emphasized that no documentary recording was truly employed in the making of the picture.
Maybe the bottom-line query is whether the result justifies the means. The Battle of Algiers spells out that, irrespective of the “appropriateness” of the reason for which the war is being battled, there would all the time be noncombatant victims –women and men carrying out their everyday activities who would not come back home since they are caught up in the inappropriate place at the inappropriate time. The Battle of Algiers sounds like an epigraph for the guiltless casualties not merely of this warfare but every war. In the rationality with which the movie is presented and the message’s universality, this film demonstrates its actual influence. I strongly recommend The Battle of Algiers since it is an electrifying film that provides insight into the happenings of Algerian Warfare of Freedom.
Bibliography
Aty, Mourad. “Either Triumph or Martyrdom: representation of women in the Algerian Revolutionary-War Movies, the case of The Battle of Algiers.” Africana Studia 26 (2020).
Chena, Salim. "“The Battle of Algiers will go on.” The reactivation of the past and protest reactivity in the Algerian democratic movement of 2019." Confluences Méditerranée 1 (2020): 227-241.
O’Leary, Alan. “Occupying Time: The Battle of Algiers.” (2019).
O’Leary, Alan. “The Battle of Algiers at Fifty: End of Empire Cinema and the First Banlieue Film.” Film Quarterly 70, no. 2 (2016): 17-29.
Radiven, Claudia. "The Battle of Algiers." (2019): 122-124.
Riegler, Thomas. “Violence as a theme in Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers and Burn!.” In Exploring Violence in Families and Societies , pp. 47-55. Brill, 2011.
Virtue, Nancy. “Poaching within the system: Gillo Pontecorvo’s tactical aesthetics in The Battle of Algiers.” Screen 55, no. 3 (2014): 317-337.
Zekri, W. “A Book Review of Inside the Battle of Algiers, by Zohra Drif: A Thematic Analysis on Women’s Agency.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 12, no. 8 (2018): 1137-1141.
