Response to the Film Gut Reactions Part 1
The central theme of the film is the need for people to feed on proper diets since they influence the types of bacteria found in their guts. In addition, the film heralds the positive effects of bacteria in the guts, the health benefits derived from healthy eating. The film, therefore, is quite informative on what people should eat to have the right mix of bacteria in their digestive systems. Three issues strike the viewer of the film, and the public should be aware of them.
First, eating healthy means that are rich in fiber is the basis of growth of the right bacteria in the body. As much as most people regard bacteria as being harmful, the film explains their importance to the immune system, which helps in preventing the possibilities of infection and an extension of life for several years. What is interesting about the bacteria is that they are easy to the culture within the guts; people only require to eat as much fiber as they can, and the risk of losing their bacteria is avoided.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Second, the film indicates that children inherit their bacteria from their parents at birth. For this reason, natural birth is preferable to cesarean birth. This stance from the film is a challenge to mothers who do not have the ability to have a normal delivery. As expected, therefore, children born through the cesarean process do not have the right levels of bacteria within their guts. However, the mothers of such children can benefit from the environment through feeding their children on as much fiber as possible because it can help boost the numbers of the gut bacteria.
Lastly, the film should change the perception by many people that health and well-being results from reactions outside the digestive system. As the film demonstrates, real health comes from the gut, the colon, from where trillions of bacteria co-exist with humans to trigger an immune communication of the whole body, including the brain. People should be advised, therefore, to take care of their guts through eating proper diet and exercise as the film explains.
Response to the Article It is the Sugar Folks
People have a habit of eating foods that are sweetened with added sugar. In fact, sugar is available most of the nations of the world and parts of the eating cultures of many people worldwide. The article points at the danger of overconsuming sugars; it is the cause of diabetes. Most people in the US have a perception that the high levels of obesity among the populace are a cause for the high levels of diabetes. However, the article changes this perspective by pointing the reversed trend. People who eat more sugars are more likely to develop chronic diabetes than those who eat less sugar. In fact, diabetes is also reported at one of the causes of obesity because it results in a metabolic syndrome.
The article is clear on how much sugar people should consume daily in their diets; the levels should be as low as below 12 ounces of sugar. This means a lot to the American society that is fond of high added sugar foods the candy, the cakes, the cookies, soft drinks, and others. The public is being advised to move away from too much sugar because as much as all calories have the same amounts of energy when broken down, sugar calories are different, they result in metabolic syndrome. Again, like the film, the article is an emphasis on healthy eating because it prolongs the lives of people. This article and the film mean that the American society should stop worrying about proper medical attention, they should only practice healthy eating, and most of their problems will have been solved.
Response to Laboratory Meat
The invention of laboratory meat has the prospect of gaining fame worldwide. However, this invention is not an immediate solution to the appetite for meat among the populations. Three reasons underpin this conclusion. The first is that not all countries across the world have the capacity to establish and maintain laboratories that will ensure a steady production of the artificial meat because it is apparently costly. Secondly, the invention is likely to be met with much criticism in the developing world where most of its economy relies on agriculture, including animal production. For this reason, the people in such nations are likely to reject the idea for fear of losses in their incomes. Lastly, the laboratory meat is likely to raise an issue of ethical orientation because some cultures do not support the idea of torturing animals, which the process of production does.
The invention is likely to kill animal production agriculture, which is one of the largest employers in the developing world and the US apart from industrial production. The campaign is likely to change the perception of people towards keeping animals for meat production. For example, the people will want to avoid agriculture are depend on cheaper meat, which could turn out problematic in the future. For example, some people might become disillusioned in the laboratory meat in terms of its taste and other aspects when compared to natural meat.
Laboratory meat is a novel idea, one that should be supported to supplement the nutritional requirements for proteins. However, the practice should be done alongside traditional agriculture if the challenges likely to face it are avoided. This way, the supply of meat to populations will be boosted more than when animal production was stopped completely.
