The level of readiness in the army is critical in countering the relevant events that require the attention of the army. The army is the plays a significant role in role in serving the American population, defending the nation, protecting the vital national interests and fulfilling the military responsibilities assigned. However, in serving these roles, the army needs to exhibit readiness in taking on diverse responsibilities. Readiness entails calculating the risks and projecting the relevant strategies that influence eliminating the potential risks ( Siebold, 2015) . Readiness influence fast wins while unreadiness leads to longer time to win or even failure. However, readiness is not a guarantee for a win for the army. Various factors influence readiness in the army. These factors include personal preparedness, equipment, training and qualifications and currency. The army needs to embrace readiness through leadership implementation that identifies the obstacles as well as identifying the possible solutions to overcoming the obstacles. This paper takes into account the importance of army readiness as well as leadership implementation in the unit as well as pointing out the specific barriers in leadership implementation to the identified barriers. The paper will also cover the possible remedies for the barriers.
The army maintains a high level of fitness along with robust health which allows them to keep alert in situations that are physically demanding. Proficiency in weapon use along with other equipment relevant in the completion of the mission is crucial in determining the readiness of the army. Mastery in the use of weapons and military equipment influence the level of army readiness. The mastery range from the use of riffles, radios to respirators which advocate for the readiness in the army ( Siebold, 2015) . Maintaining the motivation and morale in mission implementation is part of the readiness experienced in the army. Therefore, readiness impacts on the high level of fitness and excellent health condition, excellent proficiency in weapon and equipment use instill morale and motivation in the units by enhancing their understanding their role and reasons for the mission ( Odierno, 2015) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Implementation of leadership in the army requires diverse leadership skills which call for maintaining a competitive standard of the unit in different sections of the army. Some of the common factors to consider in leading a unit include the unit preparedness, maintaining the equipment, training proficiency and qualifications of the unit members as well as keeping the unit updated in changes in the field and keeping these factors in mind aids in maintaining the readiness of the unit. Unit preparedness takes into account the individual preparedness of each member of the unit with regards to weapons and equipment use and ensures the unit is equipped with current training and methods to counter any challenges while deployed.
The implementation of leadership in the army unit faces different barriers which include access and frequent training in sophisticated weapons, following a set platform in training and identifying the current trends in military across the world that requires new training. Some sophisticated weapons are not easy to access and therefore training time is limited to the few with the relevant qualifications to handle the weapons ( Goethalsa & Scala, 2018) . However, this can be resolved by providing the unit members close to the qualified unit with necessary operational information that can guide in case of emergencies. Since the subunits operate under the command of the military commander, they tend to adhere to the set routine. However, this limits the unit leader from implementing additional training to the unit. This can be resolved by consulting for more time to cover the areas that seem less covered in training. Since the army works towards defending the country from any threats, it is necessary to identify the possible risks to stand up against ( Wilson, 2017) . This calls for frequent change in strategy and training. The leaders can foster an agile transition in the unit members to embrace the constant changes that occur over time.
References
Goethals, P. L., & Scala, N. M. (2018). Eliminating the Weakest Link Approach to Army Unit Readiness. Decision Analysis , 15 (2), 110-130.
Odierno, R. T. (2015). Leader development and talent management. Military Review , 9-14.
Siebold, G. L. (2015). Military Readiness. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy-5 Volume Set (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
Wilson, J. (2017). An ethics curriculum for an evolving army. In Ethics education in the military (pp. 45-56). Routledge.
