The Burning Plain is a combination of many stories, including The Plain in Flames, Tell Them Not to Kill Me, and Luvina by Juan Rulfo. The stories revolve around politics, justice, hopelessness, and morality in society. In The Burning Plain's first story, a member of Pedro's band narrates how their revolution is against the government for their cause ( Rulfo et al., 2002) . The second story is about Juvencio, who was immoral and did not follow the rule of justice. His actions cost him peace, and he died at the hands of his avengers. In the third story, Luvina is spoken to by a teacher who exudes hopelessness to his fellow teacher re-located to Lavina.
Their different perspectives about morality, justice, and hope triggered the main protagonists' actions in the three stories. The first story, The Plain in Flames, gives a reader an insight into what happened in the historical revolutions. In most cases, such revolutions did not consider the far-reached consequences of their actions. For instance, the narrator brags about how they betrayed their Indians' friends by taking their livestock and massacring them ( Rulfo et al., 2002) . Their actions led to the triggered loss of unity between the group and the Indians. One is left to ask if any form of revolution against the government can bear justice and morality. This ambivalence is obvious at the end when the woman who had born the narrator’s child ( Rulfo et al., 2002) . In the second story, Juventio was not inclined to any law and morality when he killed Don. Juventio was consumed with guilt and did not live a comfortable life. Someone would conclude that justice was served by his unmeasurable anguish, which he felt as he ran for decades from strangers and death. Any social setup's morality dictates that a wrong deed cannot be justified to remedy an evil. Don was by no means a saint, but Juvencio provokes the question of whether any deeds can justify taking life. Any social setup's morality dictates that a wrong deed can not be justified to remedy an evil ( Rulfo et al., 2002) . Hence, any social setup's morality dictates that a wrong deed can not be justified to remedy an evil. In the last story, Lavina indicates how social justice has not been included in some parts of the country ( Rulfo et al., 2002) . The narrator, who supports the revolutionary government, laments how the government has abandoned them. Although the narrator is hopeless, the people of Luvina are held by their caring morals and traditions that they could not abandon their ancestral home.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
This story can be compared to my experience where my family was caught up in a society that prescribed diverse social norms and customs. For over four decades, my family re-located from our ancestral land to make a living in Seattle, Washington. Town life did not meet our expectations, as it became harder to sustain a big family. We resolved to return to our ancestral land and claim our land. It was morally right for us to get the land, as the law also justified our re-acquisition. However, my relatives claimed that they had developed the land to intense farming, and us taking the land back would disregard their efforts and their future livelihood. We held to our reasoning, and we got our land back. Nevertheless, the incident led to family wrangles that exist today. Both stories validate the essence of rigid social justice and morality for references in case of uncertainties.
Reference
Rulfo, J., Sacabo, J., & Peden, M. S. (2002). Pedro paramo . University of Texas Press.
