Summary of the Case Study
In the case study, Moe and Joe demonstrate a lack of self-control by planning to hold a party in a place where the fire safety limit is 50 people. They are tempted and cannot control their desire to maintain their ego by only inviting a few friends who can be accommodated in the room that they rent and they, therefore, plan to ask all even when there are risks associated with hosting such a large number. Moe buys the idea of Joe inviting many people which she knows will earn discounts on the rental price, indicating her inability to delay gratification for a better course, which is the safety of the people.
Haggar, M. S. (2013). The multiple pathways by which self-control predicts behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(13)
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The article explains the various pathways used in by the authors in which restraint is applied to predict behavior. The source provides vital information on how self-control is used to predict human responses. It is an essential source of understanding how and why people behave in a certain way. The reference will help us comprehend the differences in how the self-control of an individual can help predict or determine the behaviors of a person like Joe and Moe.
Sanjuan, P., & Magallares, A. (2014). Coping strategies as mediating variables between self-serving attributional bias and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 442–453.
The research paper provides vital information on understanding the self-serving bias. The researchers wanted to understand the coping strategies between subjective well-being and self-serving attributional Bias (SSAB). The resource is vital to this case study in that it helps create an understanding of SSAB and how it influences self-esteem and self-control. The source, therefore, will help in understanding the difference in personality behaviors as indicated by Joe and Moe.
Theory
The self-serving bias theory applies to the Moe and Joe case study. A self-serving bias is a cognitive process that is distorted by the requirement to enhance and maintain self-esteem or the tendency to consider oneself in a favorable manner that is overrated (Sanjuan, & Magallares, 2014). In the case study, Joe finds himself as Mr. Party and believes that his parties must rock. He thinks highly of himself and feels that inviting few people will ruin his reputation while he is known for holding parties that rock. Joe, in this case, is trying to protect his reputation and ego from injury and threat (Haggar, 2013). Both Joe and Moe put their lives and those of their friends in danger by wanting to fit them in the room just for the sake of their reputation.
Social Psychological Research Studies and How They Relate To Social Psychological Theory
Self-serving bias allows individuals to feel positive about themselves as well as protect themselves from psychological consequences of failure that are negative. Self-serving bias has been considered to be a part of an area in social psychology that is identified as causal attributions (Sanjuan, & Magallares, 2014). Research studies by social psychologists have indicated that attributions, which include the two internal attributions, effort and ability, and two external attributions, luck and difficulty are made regarding the behavior of individuals.
It has been identified that self-serving bias usually occurs when people make attribution for their own attributions. Individuals tend to make internal attributions that are more when there is a positive outcome, and external attributes are made when there is a negative outcome.
Ethical reasoning
Moe has found a venue with a safety limit of 50 individuals. However, the owner of the Venue is an unethical individual who provides a discount to Moe if the Venue will have more people. Moe is supposed to discuss the safety and financial details of the Venue with Joes but decides not to for personal benefits. The venue owner is morals corrupt in that they are willing to compromise the Venue's safety by bringing in more people than the Venue can host. The practical concept is applied where both Moe and the venue owners are willing to choose what will benefit their need between the costs and benefits. Joe's behavior is corrupt in that he does not mind having more people in a small venue.
Critical thinking
Joe and Moe problem at hand is that the party they are holding a party, but the number of people they want to invite is much large than the venue capacity. Joe and Moe can either choose a bigger team venue to accommodate all their friends or maintain the current Venue by keeping a safety capacity of 50 individuals. Moe is also supposed to discuss in detail all the details of the available Venue. That way, the two can figure out how to address the challenge at hand.
Key points
From the case study, it is easy to identify that both Joe and Moe lack self-control in planning for their party. The self-serving bias (SSB) theory applies to Joe and Moe in that they are willing to risk their lives and those of others just to be praised by their friends. SSB relates to social psychology is identified as social attributions (Haggar, 2013). The case study also illustrates how Joe and Moe are unable to apply ethical reasoning by making unethical decisions that put their lives and those of their friends at risk. The groups also fail to use critical thinking on their choice to overpopulate the party venue.
References
Haggar, M. S. (2013). The multiple pathways by which self-control predicts behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(13). Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00849/full Self-Serving Bias:
Sanjuan, P., & Magallares, A. (2014). Coping strategies as mediating variables between self-serving attributional bias and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 442–453.
