In this scenario, the United States has just experienced Hurricane Glenn, which displaced thousands of American citizens living in Louisiana. Consequently, the House of Representative and the Senate approved a bill which proposed to allocate $20 million to support Louisiana’s recovery efforts. With that said, the question is whether the president should support or veto the Senate policy. Supporting the policy will mean dedicating considerable national income to recovery efforts. On the other hand, vetoing the policy will cause public unrest. Therefore, the objective is ascertaining whether the president should succumb to political pressure by supporting the bill.
In my opinion, the decision regarding the bill should be made by focusing on the necessity and impact of the proposal. David Crocket argued that the government should not make decisions regarding the taxpayer's money based on human sentimentality (Crocket & Hayes, 2018). However, Crocket’s advice is unnecessary since Hurricane Glen had caused the destruction of property worth several billion dollars. Veto power should not be used unless the president aims to resist unpopular congressional policies (Hassell & Kernell, 2016). According to reliable sources, veto power gives the president leverage over public policy at the expense of his approval rating (Rice & Kernell, 2019). For that reason, vetoing a bill that has been approved by the public will destroy long term prospects for the president. Overall, it is evident that supporting the senate bill is aligned with supporting the ideals of a free and civil society.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
As the President of the United States, the most significant consideration when looking at senate bills is the importance of proposed policies. As such, the president should approve policies that have a greater impact on American citizens. On this note, veto power should be disregarded unless the president is facing too much pressure from political bodies within the government. In the end, supporting Louisiana’s budget allocation would allow displaced citizens to recover from the devastating natural disaster.
References
Crockett, D., & Hayes, B. (2013). Davy Crockett. Trajectory, Incorporated.
Hassell, H. J., & Kernell, S. (2016). Veto rhetoric and legislative riders. American Journal of Political Science , 60 (4), 845-859. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajps.12217
Rice, L. L., & Kernell, S. (2019). Presidents’ Vetoes and Audience Costs. Presidential Studies Quarterly , 49 (1), 130-152. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psq.12485
