Research has become part and parcel of the modern day world, be it in arts, sciences and social sciences. Assume a scenario where there are conflicting works and no researcher agrees with each other’s work! Who will the consumers of the research follow? Which work is valid, which is not? Replication of studies alleviates these conflicts and helps achieve harmony between all the concerned parties.
Reproducing previous studies is of great consequence in garnering further support for the matter under study, and so adding weight to the certainty and factuality of them. The aim is to not achieve significant discrepancies but to achieve substantial semblance in the works (Haig B, 2014). Meticulously duplicating research gives a gain in information not previously acquired and also insight as on how to improve existing facts. Therefore, repeat studies are crucial in fostering people’s belief in a certain work, because it not only brings out its significance but also resemblance with other works in that field.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Diversifying studies is crucial in determining the authenticity of a particular work or various publications. When it is carried in the same conditions as those the original work was done in, then it proves its validity (Baker M, 2015). Given people with same capabilities and academic achievements repeat a research and fail to get similar results, then either all of them are wrong, or one of them was wrong, or the conditions in which the study was carried in was not ideal. Although disparities occur in the multiple works, they should be within a range of each other for the original work to be valid.
Works that give different results upon replication are not necessarily wrong or inaccurate, and further works may yield better and more conclusive results. Since the works are done on different time spans, changes in environment and test objects are sure of producing different outcomes. Science is an evolving subject so the researchers should repeat studies from time to time to check disparities and similarities.
References
Baker, M. (2015). Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test . Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test- 1.18248
Haig, B. (2014). Investigating the psychological world. Scientific method in the behavioral sciences (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Scientific Findings Often Fail To Be Replicated, Researchers Say . (2015). NPR.org . Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2015/08/28/435416046/research-results-often-fail-to-be- replicated-researchers-say
