Many researchers, for instance, Swanson (1997), examines the controversy that exists on the issue of using the cochlear implant to help deaf people communicate and hear. While this has come as a great technology to boost hearing, some have not welcomed it. Most parents with deaf children have sometimes remained indifferent on which way to go between taking their children for an implant and allowing them to experience the deaf culture. The people against this technology argue that deaf is not a disability, but rather a unique culture that needs not to be cured. The author uses a variety of methods, including interviews and oral speech, to help understand the view that people have about the use of cochlear implants. Many parents who have deaf children are more likely to take them to cochlear implant technology. This move is a way to promote the wellbeing of their children. The parents want to have their deaf children improve their hearing abilities.
The parents who have taken their children for the cochlear implant technology have shown a positive change in their hearing abilities. The technology has seen a significant improvement in the way children hear and communicate with others. After the surgery for the implants, the deaf undertakes an intensive auditory-verbal training which then increases their ability to hear and communicate. Evidence from the survey shows that technology has had a positive outcome on the hearing abilities of the deaf (Swanson, 1997). Therefore, this technology is an area that most people should consider to help their deaf children improve their hearing abilities. Despite this, other people hold the view that deaf is not a disability, but rather a culture that does not require a cure.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Despite the controversy, I support the use of cochlear implants to help deaf children improve their hearing abilities. Evidence has shown that cochlear technology helps promote language development and hearing abilities. It helps the children to adapt to a healthy life, which enables them to communicate well with others in schools. Even though some argue that deaf is a culture on its own, this technology useful in hearing, the parents should, therefore, consider cochlear technology as an option to help deaf children improve their hearing. This technology has come as a boost to the deaf group who are now able to get assistance to increase their hearing. After the surgery and intensive auditory-verbal training that follows, the deaf is more likely to get support with communication and hearing.
According to Moores (2005), the issue of a cochlear implant on deaf children remains a complex area that requires further research. The authors examine the efficacy of the cochlear when used to enhance hearing amongst young deaf children. Children who receive the cochlear implants at infancy and use the into adulthood tend to experience different socio-emotional, communicative and academic developments. The experience of the children using cochlear implants depends on the expectation in a particular environment. For example, the education for the deaf and children with hearing problems in Israel is based more on the oral approach rather than the deaf identity and culture. The rise in technology has made the use of cochlear implants more effective in helping deaf children. It helps improve the hearing of the children with hearing losses and assist them in their educational achievement. Majority of the parents put their children in cochlear implants have high expectations that their children will function normally. While the parents in some countries note that they choose cochlear implants for their children with the expectation that they will as hearing children, which is different in other countries (Moores, 2005). In Sweden, the parents expect the cochlear implant will make their children fluent in both the spoken and sign language. This move shows that parents prefer to see their children utilize all the available means of communication.
I support the author's view that the rise in technology has enhanced the use of cochlear implants to help deaf children increase their hearing. This technology has come as a solution to the hearing problem faced by many children across the world. The use of this technology has risen despite the doubt on its effectiveness. When using cochlear implants, parents will have different expectations from their children. While others will expect their children to function the same way as children without a hearing problem, others will expect their children to develop bilingual. Despite the differences in expectations, children using cochlear implants will ultimately have a different experience with their hearing. This technology helps improve hearing for the deaf, which is a great improvement in enhancing the sense of hearing. The cochlear implant technology has created different philosophies about the experience of the deaf children who use it. Even though the cochlear implant technology may not help regain complete hearing, it has played a significant role in improving the hearing amongst deaf children. People can use this technology to effectively help deaf children acquire education and improve their language development. It is especially important in promoting sign language development amongst the deaf.
References
Moores, D. F. (2005). Cochlear implants: An update. American annals of the deaf , 150 (4), 327-328.
Swanson, L. (1997). Cochlear implants: the head-on collision between medical technology and the right to be deaf. Cmaj , 157 (7), 929-932.
