The social, cultural and industrial status shapes the manner in which a human being will grow to become. It is obvious that a society is responsible for shaping people into becoming better human being in future. Oved and Yaacov (2014) assert that people will subscribe to social standards that shape their future, meet their aspirations and advocates for a life without being infringed of rights. This will range from the fact that humans should be true to themselves and to practice the common good by subscribing to standards and doctrines that promote human rights and democracy. Anarchism is defined as a form of belief that advocates for a society that paces it basis on cooperation voluntarily and free associations with people, it therefore considers government authorities as undesirable and unnecessary.
Anarchism is considered good because it advocates for freedom of association, it does not support the ruling system that depends on government formation. The school of thought of anarchy is a true definition of human being who does not want to be ruled by greed, corrupt and dictatorship. It reflects people who are emancipated from kind of government that use power to manipulate people. Anarchy is good because it enables people to advocate for truth and justice, it does not subscribe to government evils with use of power. It does not advocate for dictatorship as it encourages equality among people with the same vision.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Anarchy is good because it does not advocate for poverty and slavery. In the 20 th century, the type of ruling was dictatorship; it practiced slavery such that there was no equality. The only people that survived and lived a happy life were those in the top government. The rise of anarchy supported the idea of antislavery and poverty reduction through equality and resource utilization. This explains the reason as to why anarchy is good, it advocates for a country or a nation that is free from slavery and poverty, through encouraging equal resource sharing and promoting fairness.
Anarchy promotes sustainability by advocating for good morals and healthy ecological life, this is a good act that favors every human being on earth. Taking a look at a government that uses power to manipulate its people, you find that there is immoral action that depicts the evil nature of a government. Sustainability is an act by human being that enables them to live a better life through practicing sustainable production. When it comes to ecologically good life, we find that through sustainability, people can live and enjoy the good things that comes with taking care of the nature.as compared to government that pus less emphasis on environmental conservations and sustainability this resulting to unhealthy life (Wilkin, Peter, and Carole, 2015).
Humility and compassion I the core value of anarchism, it therefore advocates for type of leadership that is based on compassion and humility. To add on it, the type of leadership should be courageous enough to fight for its people through advocating for ethical leadership. This depicts anarchism as good because it focuses on human relation; it also focuses on a type of leadership that practices ethics.it advocates for the kind of leadership that will turn the wild type of human leadership of todays, towards a self-respected, self-educated and progressive leadership. Anarchy fights for the right of people to be under a leadership that is more human based on moral concept than a leadership that is full of ego-centrism and all sorts of evil. The form of leadership that has created a rift between the poor and the rich is under criticism from anarchy. To practice the common good, it is important to conform to society morals that advocate for equality, compassion and courage, therefore this makes anarchism good (Adams, Matthew and Ruth, 2017).
Art painting in support of anarchy
From the above painting, we can conclude that the painting reflects the wishes of anarchism; the painting depicts people who are struggling to gain freedom. It advocates for human rights, through favorable work environment and security without prejudice.
The image above also reflects the wishes of anarchy, in the sense that it articulates for freedom.it is evident from the image that people who support anarchy do not conform to any government structure, especially the one that uses power to manipulate. The painting is a true reflection on how anarchy perceives life.
The painting reflects on a person in support of anarchy, an activist for this case.it is important to note that the people in support of anarchy are completely enemies of the state because they criticize the government and their actions that are not conforming to the expectation of the society.
Every opinion has the negative and the positive side, in this case, having discussed the positive side of anarchy, it is also important to examine the negative perception of it as well. The fact that government considers anarchy as a group of people who do not conform with any type of leadership apart from the one they believe; depict the negative side of anarchy. According to the current society, they depict the negative notion that anarchy is a society full of destruction and lacks a government. This is depicted by the action of activists in support of anarchy; you find that these activists will fight for their rights in a destructive way. Take for example participating in demonstrations that rebel government, these demonstrations will result to destruction of property, therefore anarchy is negative because it encourages activities that are destructive and do not favor citizens who are in government (Martin & Eryk, 2016).
Anarchy has been associated with evil, this comes in the regard to the actions from anarchist, they are found doing things that reflect a bad picture of the society. They call themselves people with intention to go against the government by standing for human rights and advocating for leadership that practices equality. However, their actions betray them, they kill people from government because they feel that the government will fell the impact, this is an evil act that depict the negative side of anarchy.it is important to note that anybody who does not conquer with the government ruling should not kill nor show hatred to the people of government. This is because we are all human beings and it is not right to kill people who support the government. The actions of anarchism therefore do not depict anything positive if they kill to communicate to the government. There are more diplomatic ways of handling state of affairs and it is important for the anarchy to settle for diplomacy than cruel actions that takes away lives of other beings.
Anarchy has been known to rebel the offices and in most cases, they are the reason behind officer killings in most states. These groups of anarchists have painted a bad picture on anarchy. Officers are the people who provide security and ensure that people are moral in their ways and that the actions of people do not harm other people. They are employed by the government to carry out these duties. However, with activist such as anarchists, these officers are finding it a challenge to carry out their duties because they often fall into the trap of anarchy where they get killed or tortured. If the same anarchy advocates for peace, liberty and progressiveness through enhancing harmony, then it is wrong for them to conduct killings because they want attention from the government (Avrich &Paul, 2015).
Anarchy lacks societal control; this has been depicted through its support for freedom without control. Every society should have a sense of control such that it should raise individuals who see the positive side of anything rather than negative. Anarchy paints a bad picture on any form of government; it therefore raises individuals not to believe in leadership that is exercised through voting. When this occurs, there will be confusion in terms of leadership and what anarchists actually want. The practice of anarchy advocates for people to have a senseless direction because they lack control in the first place. When we talk of freedom from government that uses power to manipulate the weak, we should be able to have enough evidence and fact that support the act. In short, anarchy should therefore develop or form a party that comes out without fear and use of evil acts to attract attention. It should form a party that is fully registered and known to fight for the rights of individuals. They should have goals to be met through diplomatic approaches (Parker, Tony, and Jane, 2016).
The above picture depicts the negative perception of anarchy; we are informed that society that lacks control is anarchy and that there is nothing like individual liberty. This is a negative depiction of anarchy.
From the above painting, we can differentiate between the negative energy portrayed by the anarchy and the real intention of anarchy. The two different pictures show that anarchy has intentions which are advocating for peace but on the other hand, the group of anarchist who are not diplomats will advocate for peace by turning the positive energy into a negative one.
The above picture is another depiction the negative energy portrayed by anarchy. From the picture, we are informed of the negative energy being death as depicted by anarchist killings
Reference
Parker, Tony, and Jane E. Ferrie. "Health and welfare: rejecting the state in the status quo-examples of an Anarchist approach." International Journal of Epidemiology 45, no. 6 (2016): 1754-1758.
Avrich, Paul. Russian Anarchists . Princeton University Press, 2015.
Adams, Matthew S., and Ruth Kinna. "Anarchism 1914-18: internationalism, anti-militarism and war [Table of contents]." Manchester University Press, 2017.
Oved, Yaacov. "The uniqueness of anarchism in Argentina." Estudios interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe 8, no. 1 (2014).
Wilkin, Peter, and Carole Boudeau. "Public participation and public services in British liberal democracy: Colin Ward's anarchist critique." Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33, no. 6 (2015): 1325-1343.
Martin, Eryk. "Burn it down! Anarchism, activism, and the Vancouver Five, 1967–1985." PhD diss., Arts & Social Sciences: Department of History, 2016.
