Argumentation in law focuses on legal spheres, demonstrating how legal argumentation proceeds in its entirety. I found narratives in legal argumentation impactful, particularly on forensic rhetoric where Aristotle asserts that the laws address the past questions to determine what happened back then and decide the best ways that can serve the needs of justice in contemporary society. However, there is a piece of information, which surprised me. After reading Justice Alito's Narrative, Petitioner Lilly Ledbetter claims that she has been experiencing acts of sex and pay discrimination when she was working under Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. This justifies inequality despite laws and legislations that should ensure equal treatment between men and women. Most surprising is the unexplained elements of the gender gap, which created aspects of discrimination based on sex.
I was impressed by Petitioner Lilly Ledbetter's ability to communicate because she invested history in finding a solution for her problem. The District Court granted a summary from Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and finally awarded Ledbetter for the back pay and damages. Throughout the entire text, I did not find anything that I disagreed with.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Discussion Question
How can fictional legal cases in argumentation serve as an exercise for students to adopt attorneys' roles and write beliefs on sex discrimination cases?
Application
McDonald's has real sex discrimination and mistreatment cases, something that justifies inequality in the workplace despite the common, widely recognized, and accepted legal argumentation principles. The law provides positive guidance in invention, organization, and expression of claims to everyone who may be impacted. Within the spheres of legal arguments, the court can open a forum for workers to file their claims to tackle challenges and achieve justice.
