INTRODUCTION
The men’s movement stretches back over the past few decades. The good men project is a program that aims to define what masculinity is and what men should be made of especially in the 21st century. The men's development is a developing and excessively vocal gathering that trusts Western culture and its establishments are scornful of men. Men and young men, as they contend are oppressed by women's activists and their partners (Jordan, 2016, p 32). Men’s rights groups, however, were once dismissed as they were thought to influence domestic violence. The purpose of this essay is to study the discourse of the men’s movement.
The Men's groups and other organizations have been present in the society worldwide since the 1970s, and many of them resulted from the hostile second wave of feminism. There has been a development in social philosophies worried with the condition of men and how they value their manhood in the American culture. Researchers have kept on leaning onto the issue of men and their individual characters identified with their responsibilities as fathers and in addition their status in the female life. The men's movement tries to build up assets which men in the society can use in keeping up their raised position in the public eye in connection to the females and other social minorities (Kastein, 2016 pp 260).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The Good Men Project concentrates on the informal organizations which help them to interface with each other as they look for ways and groups that would give them support. In addition The Good Men Project helps men air their grievances and enlist new individuals to represent the men’s affairs. The men’s community has also formed a discourse community online where they utilize their inimitable strategies on how they can structure their beliefs. Based on their male status, they intend to reclaim their ancient societal position which they think that they may lose to the feminist group.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Men’s Social Movement
The Good Men Project has chronicled underpinnings in various ideological frameworks that have looked to determine the alleged emergency of men and masculinity in the general public. This matches with a development of insightful research on masculinities and men. These enclaves have also materialized as a backlash against supporters of feminism and feminism itself. The Men’s Movement has continued to develop in such a way that it keeps on picking up influence among present-day men who feel mistreated by society and rebuke their female counterpart for usurping their supremacy. In the 1970s early advocates of the men's rights based their interest on second wave women's liberation. It emerged as a wellspring of fabricates encompassing male benefit and contended that social constructions work to debilitated men by saturating ladies with preferred societal standpoint ( Gill, Teese, & Sonn, 2014 p 44).
The men’s movements fall into three broad categories. The principal bunch that is the first group tends to concentrate on internal, interpersonal issues around their own particular masculinity. The second group of men likes to question and rethink models of masculinity and gender roles concentrating fundamentally on intellectual and academic. The third group is composed of men who believe that the men in the society have been oppressed for a long time. This group also focuses on the cultural reformation as well as the political and legislative point of view. They make the most noise as they believe they are the advocates representing the men.
Representation of Masculinity on the Internet and Media
The researchers on Men’s Movements draw their attention on the web and online communities especially the sites where manhood and masculinities is a topic that is mostly discussed. Online communities serve as places where social change is challenged. The internet has discussion forums that are dedicated to men’s rights and have hatred towards the feminism (Boyd & Sheehy, 2016 p 6). For example, the popular MRA site called Avoiceformen.com encourages men not to marry since marriage is unsafe as they claim, and is not suitable for the modern man. The online groups thus have a considerable measure of opportunity and adaptability to advance hostility towards women's activists. In the past, the men’s organizations were ignored by the media. However, today men have been able to get the attention of the media as well as its support. The media has also integrated the men’s group into the society (Jordan, 2016, p 24).
Organizations
In the past decades, few organizations identified with men’s claim of discrimination in the society for example in a divorce case. Today; organizations that focus on men’s rights in the society have continued to increase. Though some of the men’s organizations are small, their numeric existence creates an impression of a growing and influential community of citizens acting against harsh discrimination against men and fathers. Moreover, these relatively small organizations enhance their impact by cooperation through virtual networks and permanent ad hoc coalitions.
International Activism
One of the most innovative strategies of Men’s Movement is acting in the international sphere. This activity includes petitions before the UN committees and the USA courts. Men’s movement has made efforts to approach these committees in favor of social and cultural rights with a report alleging harsh discrimination against them. Men’s organizations are acting on an international sphere as they seek attention and what they call their rights.
Hegemonic Masculinity
The impression of hegemonic masculinity exemplifies how men are aimed at oppressing feminism and the women in general (Johansson, & Ottemo, 2015 p, 193). In addition, hegemonic masculinity does not tolerate men who lack the concepts of masculinity. Along these lines, men as an aggregate gathering pose societal power and benefit. They cannot withstand the fact that there are a few men in the society who are not strong enough to stand as real men as they call themselves. An indication of hegemonic manliness incorporates social representation that shows men as physical solid and forcing while quelling feelings or different indications of shortcoming. Hegemonic encourages the derogation of feminists to display the masculinity.
MRA support the precepts of hegemonic as they look to keep up a gender orientation progression with white hetero men at the pinnacle of power and benefit, while femininity is esteemed substandard. Men's correct gatherings depend on the support of homosocial system to maintain their conviction framework.
DISCUSSION
The findings from this substance examination give bits of knowledge on how men's right activist backlash against woman's rights. The men's developments are joined in their vilification of women's liberation and along these lines position woman's rights as having made the war on men. This study contributes the understanding of men development by investigating the procedures they use to set up their characters, delegitimize woman's rights and make a feeling of group established on battling against the impeding effect of women's liberation. It is clear that the men’s discourse is grounded on a belief of a system of hegemonic manliness through its attention on social predominance of men as well as problematizing ladies and gentility ( Jones, 2016 p 25). MRAs believe that the traditional groups that were seen as inferior have in one way or the other seized control and taken away their white male privilege. They take advantage of fear and instability and transform it into fault and fierceness. Frequently, the pioneers of these gatherings are men who feel as if they are disappointments in the society due to the women in their lives. However, social movements like the civil rights and feminism movement have come out vehemently to challenge the hegemonic ideas of masculinity. The men’s organizations pose not only a technological challenge of integrating feminist activities into the productive sphere but also philosophical and ideological challenges since they base their claims on their discrimination and demand equality (DeShong, 2015 pp 87).
Myths about Feminism
A few men think that the women feminist do not like them and that they plan on taking the men's power in the society. This, however, is not true and the reason as to why the feminist act the way they do is because of the mistreatment that women in the society experience. Men should understand that some women face horrible abuse, violence, and harassment (Phillips, 2015, p 12).
Male Power and Suffering
There have been allegations that men suffer secretly as they fear to express their emotions in public. Historically, the male citizens are the ones who got involved in wars as they defended their country. In this regard, the expansion of the men’s power became reconstituted. Male suffering has thus been invoked to justify gendered power differentials in the abuse and violence associated with them (Salter, 2016. p 71). The framing of the male dominance as an unwanted responsibility has been a characteristic of the ideology of the public or private divide. The conflation of male suffering with male violence necessarily provokes sympathy and understanding for male aggression. This confrontation introduces an asymmetry into public discussions on the impact of violence against women.
The Bonding and the Backlash
Analysis of the men’s movement contextualizes itself in feminism in an effort to identify a masculine ethic that is both empowering and enlightening. Scholars and activist of men’s studies do not always agree on the efficacy of feminism’s influence even though it has been viewed as a positive and enlightening force. Regardless, feminism has helped the male understand how to live their life as well as conduct their relationship with others (Heinrich, 2014, P 239). Feminism has also wielded considerable influence in the lives of many men who have resisted the notion of traditional sex roles just as many feminists have.
CONCLUSION
The good men project magazine is in an exceptional position that helps men ponder with the roles assigned to them and what numerous men see as clashing and even unimaginable societal desires. The good men organization has a mission to challenge men to ponder themselves and their place in the society. It is clear that gender has an important role in the community that people live. An individual’s gender identity determines the social life that one lives. Research indicates that men are the superior gender in the community or so they think but this is yet to be proven especially in the 21st century where everyone fights for equal rights.
References
Boyd, S. B., & Sheehy, E. (2016). Men's Groups: Challenging Feminism. Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 28 (1), 1-6.
DeShong, H. A. (2015). Policing femininity, affirming masculinity: relationship violence, control and spatial limitation. Journal of Gender Studies, 24 (1), 85-103.
Gill, P., Teese, R., & Sonn, C. (2014). Masculine Identity Negotiation in Everyday Australian Life: An Ethno-Discursive Study in a Gym Setting. International Journal of Men's Health, 13 (1), 42-59.
Heinrich, J. (2014). Searching for a Masculine Model: Missteps Made During Three Decades of the Men's Movement and Why Moderation Is the Key. Journal of Men's Studies, 22 (3), 238-252.
Johansson, T., & Ottemo, A. (2015). Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: the dialectic between ideology and utopia. Journal of Gender Studies, 24 (2), 192-206.
Jones, O. (2016). How to be a man. (Cover story). New Statesman, 145 (5317), 22-27
Jordan, A. (2016). Conceptualizing Backlash: (UK) Men's Rights Groups, Anti-Feminism, and Post-feminism. Canadian Journal of Women & The Law, 28 (1), 18-44. doi:10.3138/cjwl.28.1.18
Kastein, M. (2016). Self-Representations of Gender-Equality-Oriented Men’s Organizations in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Journal of Men's Studies, 24 (3), 259-276.
Phillips, T. (2015). The Role of Men in the Feminist Movement. Judgment & Decision Making, 10 (2), 11-14.
Salter, M. (2016). Men's Rights or Men's Needs? Anti-Feminism in Australian Men's Health Promotion. Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 28 (1), 69-90. doi:10.3138/cjwl.28.1.69.
