Describe the ways in which different levels of government interrelate. What solution are the different governments trying to achieve?
There are three different levels of the government with different roles and positions. The different levels are Executive, Judicial and legislative. Every state as well as the city has their specific constitution and their individual way to define their local government. The different governmental levels makes it effective for each government to create laws as well as be able to enforce the law as opposed to occupying power by an individual or group of them. The constitution also provides for all states to work in relationships to support each state authority.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In order to govern and secure people’s rights effectively, the levels of government should work together and be able to achieve agreeable solutions in case there are any issues arising. The work of the government should be achieved irrespective of their location, and whether it is performed on a state or federal level. The government is separated due to the varied nature and characteristics including the scope, authority and the type and closeness of the work. The government scope of work can be achieved on the basis of the amount of legitimacy it has within its gap of authority. The federal government deals with law issues that affect the whole country such as national defense, security of the border, foreign affairs as well as workplace safety. On the other hand, state government is in charge of the programs that assist the citizens of the state, interested businessmen and people visiting the state.
Identify the advantages and disadvantages in the ways that the governments involved work together.
The advantages in the ways the governments involved work together, for instance, in hydrofracking, included allowing cities to buy fracking fluid reclaimed to de-ice the roads which are accumulated with snow storms and blizzards during winter since the mixture is of high salt concentration. On the contrary, one disadvantage of hydrofracking is that the farms closer to drilling locations report health issues among animals and livestock stillbirths.
Provide a possible solution to the current way of hydrofracking that would be better by having different levels of government work together. Include ways in which communication between the governments might be improved.
The constitution allows for the power division between state, local as well as federal governments. However, although the governments are aware of their limits, they do not subscribe to every issue at hand. Local governments operate independently while the federal and state operate parallel to each other. But, with regards to hydrofracking, there are laid down procedures on how the process completes the national, state and local levels. Hydrofracking is a novel advancement of new technological procedure that assists produce natural gas, by drilling deep down the earth. The drilling of natural gases from the earth is through using water. Natural gas is cost effective compared to its respective oil-fuel. According to people of pro-hydrofracking, the process is safe, even though there is a lack of proven incidence of the process in contaminating drinking water. On the contrary, individuals opposed to hydrofracking, state that if water that is used for drilling leaks out, there is a possibility of contaminating drinking water as a result of water used during the fracturing process. Thus, the federal government should be strict on the procedures of hydrofracking.
A possible solution to the present way of hydrofracking could be the federal government conducting surveillance of the site as well as review the chemicals the state is likely to use to do hydrofracking. The process is essential for lessening the electricity cost by using water in the extraction of natural gas. In Texas, hydrofracking is an issue due to lack of water. Thus, waste water from mining can be transported to drilling sites through pipes from mines. However, more research should be conducted to strengthen hydrofracking about the site prior to initiating the process.
The process of hydraulic fracture pollutes the environment leaving behind pollutants at the drilling site and chemicals are likely to leak out the pipelines and flow to the nearest source of water supply. Thus, it poses a health hazard to the general public. Meanwhile, the state governments of various states including New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey have been debating to allow hydrofracking sites close to Delaware River. State, local and federal governments work together to enable the process done while the different political levels are working together to reduce the cost of energy.
Identify a way for local and state governments to both stimulate their economies while being respectful of the environment.
Governments can be respectful of the environment by offering improved federal regulations to enhance the process while making it less pollutant to the neighboring environment. Further, the government can be respectful by making it more sustainable by creating provisions for the less fortunate. The provision should highlight that during hydrofracking, companies must compensate farmers for using their land. Also, after hydrofracking, the respective company should restore the site, for instance by planting trees in increase vegetation cover.
Individuals who are pro-hydrofracking are satisfied that with the regulations provided by the federal government on hydraulic fracturing, engineers are excavating deep enough to disallow toxins to flow up where there is water supply. In addition, these individuals believe that the earth has sufficient natural gas to assist in addressing issue of energy insufficiency while reducing the expensive cost of electricity bills. Further, it will as well bring job to many people.
Provide an example of a current issue near your home that involves multiple governments and the ways in which they do or do not work together effectively. Examples could include environmental, educational, or technological issues.
A family resided in a farm closer to a drilling site and had a well, which was the main source of their domestic water. The energy company had been drilling in the site for some time now, almost five years. Three years later, the mother of the homestead developed tumor. The tumor was suspected to be from the chemicals sipping from the site to the water in the well which they consumed locally. The family then sued the company and it was compensated a settlement worth multimillion dollar. The company further refused to admit that they were the cause of the problem.
Therefore, governments should ensure the disclosure of the entire chemicals used during hydrofracking by making it an obligatory process. Thus, it will enable the people associated to be aware of the chemicals linked to the processes. Another benefit of the governments working in unison is to make sure that they assist in ensuring laws are regulated for drinking water, clean air and even wildlife. Once laws are in place, and emphasized by the federal government, the hydrofracking companies for the relevant state will adhere strictly to the procedures therein. Thus, the public will be sure of clean drinking water as well as clean and fresh air.
References
Nolon, J. R., & Bacher, J. A. (2014). Highest Court in New York Affirms Local Power to Regulate Hydrofracking. Routledge.
Richardson Jr, J. J. (2014). Local regulation of hydraulic fracturing. W. Va. L. Rev. , 117 , 593.
