Tobacco companies, for a long time have, continues to flourish in many parts of the world. As a producer of addictive, caffeine drugs, the companies have also been in the eye of the storm owing to the many numbers of regulations that pits it against the customers and its interest ( Zhu et al., 2014) . Many governments and bodies are split on the best approach to mediate between the consumers and the companies’ interests in as far as matters of operations and legitimacy are concerned.
While the harm of consuming tobacco is real, the addiction to the same, especially in developing countries have left many families and institutions that are most addicted to such operations messed up. It is on such backdrop of facts that in many countries, tobacco companies continue to be exploited with heavy taxation to limit the degree and some products that they churn into the market at any given time ( Zhu et al., 2014) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The tobacco companies have taken an extra mile of indicating a warning of the harmful impact of smoking on their packets. Such a signal should be educative enough to the consumers to make rational decisions as to smoke or quit ( Clifford, Hill & Collin, 2014) . I fail to understand why the choices of adults of sound mind are entirely placed on the shoulders of an innocent company that is only operating the legal business for revenue purposes.
The importation and exportation of tobacco products have earned the government much revenue for its development and operations. Similarly, the companies have also put in place safety measures for all its staffs who are non-smokers ( Zhu et al., 2014) . They have to put on protective masks and inhalers to caution them from inhaling the harmful gasses of the tobacco products.
On this matter, while it remains controversial, the taxation approach was used to discourage consumers from taking too much of the tobacco products. This has not been helpful either. There is need to create a less hostile environment for tobacco companies to operate and compete, without the extensive victimization that they are exposed to currently ( Clifford, Hill & Collin, 2014) .
References
Clifford, D., Hill, S., & Collin, J. (2014). Seeking out ‘easy targets’? Tobacco companies, health inequalities and public policy. Tobacco control , 23 (6), 479-483.
Zhu, S. H., Sun, J. Y., Bonnevie, E., Cummins, S. E., Gamst, A., Yin, L., & Lee, M. (2014). Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tobacco control , 23 (suppl 3), iii3-iii9.
