One diagnosis that globally made across the planet is tuberculosis. It is mostly associated with affecting the lungs. The infection is caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 160). The identified less commonly diagnosis for the lungs is Malignancy. The diagnosis emerges from in between the bronchial tree into the peripheral lung tissue (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 161).
While both diagnoses are attributed to coughs, dyspnea, and weight loss, the two however manifest different signs and symptoms that are unique to both of them. For instance, Tuberculosis is diagnosed in manifestation of such signs and symptoms as common coughs associated with sputum production (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 160). However, it is important to take not that an observation of the habitual sputum is only accurately observed as s sign or symptom if it has been continuous for up to three weeks.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
On the other hand, Malignancy can be observed by notable signs such as hemoptysis, fatigue, wheezing and discomfort in the chest area (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 161). Symptoms such as asymmetrical breath sounds or adventitious sounds and stridor may be related to Malignancy. In the course of examination, despite the similar symptoms that the two diagnoses manifest, a distinction of the two can be accurately made in the course of a diagnostic study. While the chest film reveals multi-lobular granulomas for Tuberculosis, the case is different for Malignancy (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 160). In its diagnosis, the chest film is always non-diagnostic (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 161). Other distinct diagnostic attributes that would be associated with tuberculosis include a positive skin testing and sputum that reveals acid-fast bacilli, which as well depicts mycobacterium tuberculosis (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 160) . On the other hand, with regard to Malignancy, diagnosis is made on biopsy and histopathy with samples acquired through fine needle aspiration, bronchoscopy or any other relevant means (Goolsby & Grubbs, 2006, p. 161).
As evidenced above, the two conditions are present in the lungs, yet are one commonly diagnosed, while the other is less common.
References
Goolsby, M. J., & Grubbs, L. (2006). Advanced assessment: Interpreting findings and formulating differential diagnoses. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
