In today’s surroundings, it has become necessary to describe and assess different personalities. For example, one would be defined to have acquired their personalities from their mothers or fathers. As many discussions about personality exist, not a lot of people have an idea of what it is concerning. Personality psychologists work on different reflections to determine why people behave the way they do( Wiernik et al., 2019) . Usually, several informal evaluations of personality tend to focus more on individuals. Personality experts use a variety of unique conceptions of personality that relate to every individual. Thus, the study for personality topics results in the development of specific theories that explain the development of personality traits and their importance. As there are many definitions of personality, the key ones focus on the characteristics and patterns of behaviors. According to Mõttus et al. (2019), the traits can help in explaining and predicting someone's behavior. As psychologists would disclose personality, they usually describe it from the genetic, environmental, and experience of an individual. The three factors are significant determinants for shaping individuals' personality traits. For instance, environmental factors are essential in shaping the expression and developing one's personality. The environmental factors comprise culture and parenting styles.
Personality as a Useful Construct
However, psychologists have identified personality as a useful construct in various ways. It can be identified by using characteristics and traits adaptation. The two are necessary for predicting or identifying people's behavior and accounting for their differences. Though, they cannot account for the integrative nature of personality functioning and the perspective of a person wholeness ( Mõttus et al. , 2019). Some theories have mostly explained the integrative nature, as holistic quality. Such concepts would be identified as a character structure, ego, and self. According to different studies, the ego is proposed as a master integrator of subjective experience. Through the survey, several stages of ego development are operationalized through the coding of sentence-completion assessments ( Wiernik et al., 2019) . Through the integration of personal experiences into their own stories, it can lead to evolving or progressive narratives and internalization of self, which provides people's existence or lives with purpose, unity, and meaning.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Mõttus et al. (2019) explain that different personality theories have attempted to responsibly explain human individuality in different perspectives or life stories that are created by people. Such approaches put more effort into the study of living tradition and idiographic. Though the theories also entirely increase the nuanced comprehension of psycholiterary concepts of social life, which depends on circumstances of cultural modernity and postmodernity ( Wiernik et al., 2019) . It also suggests the cases of individual differences in narrations about life. Therefore, as per theories and concepts of personality in psychology, character alone is an essential contract on characteristic adaptation, patterns dispositional traits, and integrative life experiences that evolve.
Also, from different personality theories, personality has been identified as an essential construct in matters of understanding a person's surroundings or world( Mõttus et al., 2019) . Such a conception is usually based on an individual's experience or daily up takes/activities. It changes over a given period and particularly to a person. For example, Eysenck’s trait theory bases his argument on genes and personality. He suggests that personality is wholly fixed and genetically obtained. Certain personality traits sometimes determine an individual's behavior. According to Eysenck’s theory, personality is a matter of dimensions rather than absolute categories. Dimensions comprise of less or more strongly introverted, whereas, the absolute category only entails introvert.
A personality construct can also explain how change can be achieved. Through personal construct theory (PCT) by George Kelly explains how people appear differently to each other. The approach can help to view the existing individual differences. Wiernik et al. (2019) argue that concerning agency-structure dualism, individuals can change because of the available biological or social arrangements or personal agency. However, through comparing and contrasting between TT and PCT concerning duality, the human studies provide discordant means of understanding individual differences in personality. Both theories may be complimentary, but they both help to comprehend individual and personality differences.
In determining future directions, personality constructs can be useful in explaining the whole aspect. For instance, there is a broader linkage between offending and personality construct, and also on biological cases of personality constructs. The personality traits are assessed or evaluated early in life and correlated with the following offenses, for instance. Such can be used as a base for investigating the impacts of biological, peer, family, school, and individual influences on crime and personality. Psychologists have conducted research and proved if changes follow changes and personality in offending ( Mõttus et al., 2019 ). For instance, there are issues of childhood temperament psychologists suggest that likable offenders can be identified earlier in their lives. Before the early offenders proceed to another stage of development, efforts or concerns should be in consideration while making changes amongst young children or adolescents who possess the uncontrolled or uninhibited temperaments.
In conclusion, personality is a useful contract about defining or determining individual characters and traits. It helps match types of people with examples of interventions or corrections because people interact differently. Every attribute accompanies a particular risk or undermining factor, which means that every necessary change should tailor to personalities. Ideally, psychologists can achieve such by developing specific intervention programs.
References
Mõttus, R., Allik, J., &Realo, A. (2019). Do self-reports and informant-ratings measure the same personality constructs?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment .
Wiernik, B. M., Bornovalova, M. A., Stark, S. E., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Constructs versus measures in personality and other domains: What distinguishes normal and clinical?. Industrial and organizational psychology , 12 (2), 157-162.
