Psychoanalytic and humanistic theory make up two key personality theories that help explain my personality. It is worth noting that the psychoanalytic theoretical framework contends that individual behaviors emanate from interactions between three components of the human mind, that is, the superego, the id, as well as the ego. Humanistic theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the good associated with humans, in addition to their potential, purpose, creativity, connection, health, meaning, self-actualization and hope. In essence, both theoretical perspectives give crucial insights into how some of my most conspicuous personality traits came about. One such trait includes my empathetic persona. With reference to the psychoanalytic theoretical perspective, my empathetic personality trait came about as a result of the superego and ego components of my brain. Growing up, my superego played a pivotal role in learning and discerning what my culture considers to be right or wrong actions and decisions. Given that my culture views empathy as a virtue, as opposed to vice, I gradually developed the capacity to comprehend and place myself in the shoes of other people. The ego component of my brain helped shape my empathetic personality trait, in that, it enabled me to rationally and pragmatically determine that showing empathy towards other people is the right action. Notably, the ego element of my brain played a pivotal role in the development of my empathetic personality primarily because it is partially conscious and partially subconscious.
The humanistic theoretical perspective remains critical to understanding how my empathetic personality trait came about. To begin with, the humanistic theory focuses on the good associated with humans, and acts of empathy are consistent with this aspect of the theory. Second, the core values linked to the humanistic theoretical perspective played a pivotal role in shaping my empathetic personality trait. One such value includes the conscious nature of human beings. Conscious, in this context, denotes self-awareness, in addition to the awareness that one lives in the presence of other people. Over time, my conscious nature allowed me to become increasingly aware of the fact that harmonious coexistence with other individuals was contingent upon the way I chose to treat them. The second key value that helped shaped my personality includes the responsibility that comes with the ability of humans to make choices. Growing up, I gradually came to terms with the fact that I had a solemn responsibility to treat people empathetically, the number of choices at my disposal notwithstanding.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The psychoanalytic and humanistic theoretical perspectives offer varying explanations concerning how my imaginative personality trait came about. Concerning the psychoanalytic theoretical perspective, the dominance of my ego over my id and my superego helps explain the development of my imaginative persona. It is worth noting that the three components of the human brain are in constant conflict and the dominant component has a profound influence on individual human behavior. In my development from childhood to adulthood, my ego gained prominence over my id in my decision-making processes. In this regard, my ego played a significant role in shaping my imaginative personality trait because it entails rational, logical, and pragmatic thinking. Regarding the humanistic theoretical perspective, key values linked to the theory remain critical to understanding how my imaginative personality trait came about. One such value includes the propensity of human beings to seek creativity, meaning, and value. Over time, my need to seek meaning and creativity has inevitably contributed to the development of my imaginative personality trait. In addition, the phenomenological aspect of the humanistic theoretical perspective helps elucidate the development of my imaginative personality trait. This is primarily because phenomenology revolves around the investigation of conscious points of view, as well as the meanings and significance one attaches to specific phenomena. Given that my imaginative persona underpins my creativity in a raft of fields, it is evident that my ability to observe and create meaning out of different phenomena played a pivotal role in the development of my imaginative trait. It is worth noting that the central element of phenomenology is my conscious experiences, the context within which I experience phenomena, in addition to how I make sense of the different phenomena.
The psychoanalytic and humanistic theoretical frameworks also provide valuable insights into how my sociable personality trait came about. Concerning the psychoanalytic theoretical framework, the superego component of my mind helps explain the development of my sociable personality trait. Most notably, the superego contributed to the development of this persona because it pertains to the wide range of social values that one acquires as he/she transitions from childhood to adulthood. In addition, the superego works as a moral constraint on human conduct and enables people to nurture their conscience. Growing up, I learned that social skills made up an important cultural value. Ultimately, my superego allowed me to become increasingly sociable well into my adulthood. The humanistic theoretical perspective offers crucial insights into how my sociable personality trait came to be. More specifically, the core values linked to the humanistic theoretical framework remain critical to understanding the development of my humanistic persona. One such value includes the existence of human beings in a distinctively human context and cosmic ecology. The second key-value includes my awareness that I coexist with other people within my society. Growing up, the inculcation of the aforementioned values played a preeminent role in the development of my sociable personality trait.
