According to Walker, if God is morally perfect, he must only engage in actions that are morally best actions. He further goes ahead to assert that the creation of humans does not qualify as the morally best deed. However, this argument is flawed from one basic premise. It tends to assert that the mere existence of humans contradicts the fact that God exists. From an anthropic point of view, one would question the reasoning behind God’s creation of humans rather than other gods. Walker utilizes an analogous point of view, where he says that the perfect nature of God would warrant him to create fellow gods.
The creation of humans, morally imperfect beings, beats logic and leads to serious questions regarding the existence of God. However, from a Christian point of view, God has three fundamental characteristics that make him stand out. They include his omnipotence, omniscience, and the fact that he is morally perfect. Theists debunk the existence of God from the fact that evil exists. Questions have been raised as to why God decided to create humans rather than morally perfect individuals. However, several reasons could mitigate the argument from Walker's point of view. First, it is without a doubt that God is omnipotent.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
It, therefore, means that he knew how things would turn out to be. Other than the creation of fellow gods, he allowed evil to prevail as a way of emphasizing his presence. Morals can only be defined when individuals know what immorality entails. Similarly, humans would only know how to do good if they knew what evil entailed. Therefore, if God decided to create fellow gods, then his essence as a Supreme being would have remained largely irrelevant due to a lack of another center of comparison that would drive humans to perform even greater good.
