Although Post-colonial interpretation, African American and Womanist interpretations are different fields, there are few similarities seen in them. These interpreters had the need to decolonize the American mind; thus, the interpretation of the word 1 . They were also keen to destabilize the hierarchies while also playing the notion of power relationships between the colonizer and the colonized.
A common goal for interpretation of the bible for all the three groups of interpreters was to spread the word. Although each group had a different reason behind spreading the word (315 2 ). They had the common goal of interpreting the bible for their groups to be able to read the bible and understand it in a manner that would make sense to them.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The differences between post-colonial interpretation and African American and Womanist interpretation is that while African American and Womanist interpreters tried to liberate the cultures, the post-colonial interpretation had little to no effect at emancipating them cultures (314 3 ). The postcolonialists interpreters are seen to be condescending to the people they claim to give a voice while African American womanist interpreters give them an actual voice.
Another difference is the fact that post-colonial interpreters did not take their time to understand African American and Womanist interpretations of the bible (38 4 ). Thus the two groups understood the post-colonial interpretations, but the postcolonialists’ interpreters did not understand their interpretations.
Postcolonialists are also different from African American and Womanist interpreters as postcolonialists focus on the discourse of resistance, as they used their cultural resources to shed light on the biblical narratives. Thus the postcolonialists’ interpreters offered valuable insights to the biblical interpretation process (315 5 ). The African American and Womanist theorists, on the other hand, used contemporary Jewish readings on exodus when interpreting the bible.
Bibliography
Ukpong, Justin S. "Reading the Bible in a global village: Issues and challenges from African readings." Reading the Bible in the global village: Cape Town 940 (2002).
Segovia, Fernando F. "Biblical criticism and postcolonial studies: Toward a postcolonial optic." The postcolonial biblical reader (2006): 119-132.
Synopsis of additional interpretive methods. 311-316
1 Segovia, Fernando F. "Biblical criticism and postcolonial studies: Toward a postcolonial optic." The postcolonial biblical reader (2006): 119-132
2 Synopsis of additional interpretive methods. 311-316
3 Synopsis of additional interpretive methods. 311-316
4 Ukpong, Justin S. "Reading the Bible in a global village: Issues and challenges from African readings." Reading the Bible in the global village: Cape Town 940 (2002).
5 Synopsis of additional interpretive methods. 311-316
