Part 1
Some cultures prefer expensive cure for diseases to cheaper ones for different reasons. Some base their argument on social values, believes and cultures that perceive these treatments as unacceptable. A good example of such is some African countries where earlier on parents rejected free immunisation of their children against childhood diseases although this changed later. The fundamental reason for the resistance was that immunization was said to go against social beliefs and rumour had it that the drugs were injected to control the population other than immunisation (Feachem, Hogan, & Merson, 1983).
Another possible reason is cost. The cost that comes with preventive measures may discourage not only the people but also the government, and thus such measures may never be implemented at all. Also, lack of awareness is another possible reason as to why these measures may be unpopular in the society. People do not know the importance of prevention and how better it is compared to treatment and therefore may never consider these measures at all. Considering all these challenges, it proves difficult for some cultures to use preventive measures and therefore they only find themselves spending a lot of money on treatment.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Part 2
For a moving nation, having a plan that focuses on more acceptable preventive measures while putting minimal emphasis on costly treatment is crucial. I am going to develop a plan that will focus on preventive measures and ensure that people shift away from cure measures to the preventive ones (Watt, 2005) . One challenges that program designer faces while trying to come up with a program that is universally acceptable will be cultural diversity. The fact that some cultures are very conservative in the way they do things and modes of upbringing their young ones poses a challenge to developing a convincing plan for them.
For my program, I need to establish entwined relationships amongst the government, society and other stakeholders. The program will be based on efficient preventive measures that are cost-effective, whereby, the stakeholders in the health department and the government provide for all the expenses (Watt, 2005) .
The government will be tasked with catering for all the cost incurred. This is because people are reluctant to pay for something they do not know its importance (Axelsson, Paulander, Svärdström, Tollskog, & Nordensten, 1993) . On the same note, the government will find a way of raising cash to cater for the same from the society by maybe forcing them to spend some resources on catering for these measures. The role of the stakeholders is to educate the society on the importance of preventive measures. It needs to be explained to the society the advantages of preventive measures over curative measures for diseases. The stakeholders will have the task of educating the society on the importance, the difference in expenditure, and the short-term and long-term effects on their health (Axelsson, Paulander, Svärdström, Tollskog, & Nordensten, 1993) . For example, if preventive measures are employed, one won’t have to suffer pain while getting over a disease like curative measures.
On the other hand, the society needs to be ready to adopt the new culture of life. The government needs to enforce that member of the society need to visit health centres and get medical checkups regularly (Breslow & Somers, 1977). Worldwide health organisations (WHO) can help launch the program and ensure it is adhered to. Other stakeholders, such as health centres, have to educate the society why they need to adopt preventive measures and help in implementing the program. It can also be implemented in the education system too (Breslow & Somers, 1977). For example, believes that hinder preventive measures can be addressed in the school syllabus so that the society is aware what practices to change to participate in the program fully.
Logically, this program should be implemented in a way that every party involved plays their role effectively, ensuring that expensive measures are discouraged. If implemented effectively, the program is expected to give very positive feedback, and the society will adapt easily and fit in.
References
Axelsson, P., Paulander, J., Svärdström, G., Tollskog, G., & Nordensten, S. (1993). Integrated caries prevention effect of a needs-related preventive program on dental caries in children. Caries research , 27 (Suppl. 1), 83-94.
Breslow, L., & Somers, A. R. (1977). The lifetime health-monitoring program: a practical approach to preventive medicine. New England Journal of Medicine , 296 (11), 601-608.
Feachem, R. G., Hogan, R. C., & Merson, M. H. (1983). Diarrhoeal disease control: reviews of potential interventions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization , 61 (4), 637.
Watt, R. G. (2005). Strategies and approaches in oral disease prevention and health promotion. Bulletin of the World Health Organization , 83 (9), 711-718.
